Medical Lower Cholesterol w/ Fish Oil & Red Yeast Rice

  • Thread starter Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Fish oil and red yeast rice have been shown in studies to effectively lower cholesterol levels, making them potential alternatives for those seeking natural supplements. However, concerns exist regarding the quality and dosage of these supplements, as well as the risk of contaminants such as mercury in fish oil. Eating fatty fish is recommended as a safer option to obtain necessary nutrients without the risks associated with concentrated supplements. For individuals in their 40s and 50s, discussing these options with a healthcare provider is advised, especially for those with statin intolerance. Overall, while fish intake has health benefits, caution is warranted, particularly for pregnant women.
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
22,355
Reaction score
7,176
An associate told me yesterday about lowering cholesterol with supplements of fish oil and 'red yeast rice'. I was skeptical, but apparently studies have shown that the claim appears to be true.

Fish Oil, Red Yeast Rice Cut Cholesterol
http://www.webmd.com/cholesterol-management/news/20080723/fish-oil-red-yeast-rice-cut-cholesterol

One potential shortcoming of a "homeopathic, natural approach" is the lack of control on quality and content/dose of supplements.

What one should know - Red yeast rice (Monascus purpureus)
http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/red-yeast-rice/NS_patient-redyeast

http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/druginfo/natural/patient-redyeast.html


Safety of Red Yeast Rice for High Cholesterol in Individuals With Statin Intolerance
http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00639223


For those in their 40's and 50's, this may be worthwhile discussing with one's doctor. Prevention is better than treatment.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Biology news on Phys.org
If you eat fatty fish you'll also be getting all the necessary supplements, so you don't need to buy the 'homeopathic' fish-oil capsules :-p

On a more serious note, I'd be careful with taking fish-oil capsules, especially when you already have fish incorporated in your diet. It is know that chemicals such as mercury, PCBs and dioxin accumulate in fish and fish-oil capsules are a concentrated form of that. It is better to take oil capsules based on algae (they exist, and no fish were harmed in the process as well). It is something I also recommended to my mother.

Overall I must say that the benefit of eating fish outweighs the risks (see the publication below), except when you are pregnant, when you should be careful with eating fish.

http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/reprint/296/15/1885"
JAMA Vol. 296 No. 15 said:
Fish (finfish or shellfish) may have health benefits and also contain contaminants, resulting in confusion over the role of fish consumption in a healthy diet. [..] For major health outcomes among adults, based on both the strength of the evidence and the potential magnitudes of effect, the benefits of fish intake exceed the potential risks. For women of childbearing age, benefits of modest fish intake, excepting a few selected species, also outweigh risks.
There may be more recent studies.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
for one, purified fish oils are easy to find now. i believe this usually results in an esterified version of the lipids.

also, algae is an expensive source of DHA. i wouldn't recommend it unless you are a determined vegan.

if you're that paranoid about PCBs, then a better choice would be some of the first critters in the food chain that feed on algae, krill. you can actually buy krill oil now, which contains not only DHA, but also EPA in a phospholipid form.

if you're really, really paranoid about PCBs, then the occasional hypocaloric diet with supplemental olestra might be for you.

as for pregnancy, i have read studies that show more positive outcomes when expectant mothers eat more FISH. i haven't seen less positive outcomes mentioned, and i haven't seen the studies using algal DHA. but i have seen a lot of speculation that fish is bad.
 
Folks - remember the "cholesterol lowering effect" reported is not only limited, as was said, by variations in the material as supplied but also will not work for all persons an d the effect itself may be technically significant but clinically irrelevant.
 
hypatia said:
Here is the study, if anyone should want to look at it.

http://web.med.harvard.edu/sites/RELEASES/html/090908_oken.html

thanks for that. another, mentioned in Monique's link i think, indicated that fish are an important source of micronutrients other than omega-3 fatty acids.

Public Health Nutr. 2008 Nov 6:1-9. [Epub ahead of print]Click here to read Links
Contribution of fish to intakes of micronutrients important for fetal development: a dietary survey of pregnant women in the Republic of Seychelles.
Bonham MP, Duffy EM, Robson PJ, Wallace JM, Myers GJ, Davidson PW, Clarkson TW, Shamlaye CF, Strain J, Livingstone MB.

1Northern Ireland Centre for Food and Health (NICHE), Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster, Coleraine BT52 1SA, UK.

OBJECTIVES: To characterise the diets of pregnant women in the Republic of Seychelles and to determine the contribution of fish to intakes of nutrients important for fetal and neonatal development. DESIGN: Observational, prospective study. SETTING: Seychelles Child Development Centre, Mahé, Republic of Seychelles.Subjects and methodsPregnant women (n 300) were recruited at their first visit to an antenatal clinic. At 28 weeks' gestation subjects completed a 4 d diet diary (n 273) and intakes were analysed using dietary analysis software. RESULTS: Mean (sd) energy intake was 9.0 (2.5) MJ/d and fat intakes were higher than UK recommendations for almost two-thirds of the cohort. Fish consumption was lower than in previous surveys, suggesting a move towards a more Westernised diet. Low intakes of a number of nutrients important during pregnancy for fetal development (Fe, Zn, Se and iodine) were observed. However, women who met the current recommendations for these nutrients consumed significantly more fish than those who did not (97 v. 73 g/d). CONCLUSIONS: The present study highlights the importance of fish in the diet of pregnant Seychellois women for ensuring adequate intakes of micronutrients important in fetal development. Dietary patterns in Seychelles, however, are in a state of transition, with a move towards a Western-style diet as evidenced by higher fat and lower fish intakes. If these dietary trends continue and fish consumption declines further, micronutrient status may be compromised. These findings suggest caution in establishing public health policies that promote limitation of fish intake during pregnancy.

PMID: 18986594 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
 
Red Yeast Rice has been used in Chinese cuisine and as a medicinal food to promote blood circulation for centuries. The medicinal properties of red yeast rice favorably impact lipid profiles of hypercholesterolemic patients.

[mentor edit: URL to online store deleted. Please provide a scientific reference for your claim.]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
On line stores are not a good source of information, because they are trying to sell the product.
 
Back
Top