Setting the Atmosphere on Fire?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JRDunassigned
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atmosphere Fire
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the potential effects of increasing atmospheric oxygen levels beyond 30%, particularly regarding fire behavior and combustion. It highlights that oxygen is just one component of the Fire Triangle, which also includes heat and fuel, indicating that a spark is necessary to ignite fires. The conversation also references the KT extinction event, where a massive asteroid impact caused significant atmospheric changes. This event led to the ejection of debris that re-entered the atmosphere, generating intense heat and igniting widespread fires, ultimately resulting in a global winter due to dust obscuring sunlight. The aftermath included a rise in CO2 levels, contributing to a prolonged period of global warming and the emergence of new plant life.
JRDunassigned
Is it possible? As far as I know you'd need energy from a star nucleus greater than the suns to cause any change in the atmosphere, creating heavier gasses right?

Could the amount of oxygen in the air going above 30% have any impact other than fires burning longer, or any human combustion?

Just curious. Ignore the lab coat, maniacal laugh and questionable mustache
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
JRDunassigned said:
Is it possible? As far as I know you'd need energy from a star nucleus greater than the suns to cause any change in the atmosphere, creating heavier gasses right?

Could the amount of oxygen in the air going above 30% have any impact other than fires burning longer, or any human combustion?

Just curious. Ignore the lab coat, maniacal laugh and questionable mustache

O2 is just one side of the Fire Triangle. What are the other 2 requirements for fire?
 
heat and fuel! you only need a spark to ignite the fumes :D
 
JRDunassigned said:
heat and fuel! you only need a spark to ignite the fumes :D

Correct-a-mundo! So to set the atmosphere on fire, you need one tiny spark, and a huge what?
 
BTW, just a reminder to everyone that dangerous activities are not allowed discussion topics on the PF. But we are talking non-physical stuff here, so it's sort of okay...
 
Something like this is hypothesized during the KT extinction event 65Ma.

A 5 mile asteroid collides with earth, forming a 100 mile crater.
It ejects a large amount of material into low Earth orbit.
As this material re-enters that atmosphere, a trillion or so meteors are formed.
The meteors burn up as they fall to earth. This heats the
atmosphere to over 1000F, thereby incinerating the surface of the earth.
The Dinosaurs that survive the initial impact, earthquakes and tsunami's are
then cooked in the heat blast which last for several hours.
A global fire then continues to rage for a few days, burning all the trees and surface plants.

The dust then obscures the sun and plunges the Earth into a global winter
for a few years. After the dust clears, all the CO2 that is now in the
atmosphere results in a prolonged period of global warming.

Fish and turtles survive okay as do small burrowing creatures. Ferns are among
the first plants to start growing on the land.

The end of one era and the beginning of another.
 
Thread 'The Secrets of Prof. Verschure's Rosetta Stones'
(Edit: since the thread title was changed, this first sentence is too cryptic: the original title referred to a Tool song....) Besides being a favorite song by a favorite band, the thread title is a straightforward play on words. This summer, as a present to myself for being promoted, I purchased a collection of thin sections that I believe comprise the research materials of Prof. Rob Verschure, who at the time was faculty in the Geological Institute in Amsterdam. What changed this...
Back
Top