Can the End of the Universe Be Measured with a Bouncing Wave? Great Video

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of measuring the universe's end using a wave that could bounce back from it. It is noted that the universe lacks a definitive boundary, as it is continuously expanding. Consequently, light emitted from distant objects today will never return to us, since those objects have moved beyond our observable reach. Estimates of the universe's size are complicated by this expansion, making it impossible to see beyond approximately 15 billion light years. The conversation highlights a video by astrophysicist David Schlegel that further explains the challenges of measuring the universe.
cfortes
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Is it possible to measure the supose end of the universe with a wave that will bounce of the end of the universe and return ?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

The universe does not appear to have such a boundary.
 
cfortes said:
Is it possible to measure the supose end of the universe with a wave that will bounce of the end of the universe and return ?
A light wave that we emitted today would not be able to return from the most distant things we can see today. Basically, we can see the ancient light that these things emitted long ago, but in the mean time they've moved so far away that we'll never be able to see the light that they emit today.
 
the universe is constantly expanding. such a boundary is always getting larger and by the time we see it, the universe is already larger than what we saw it as. many of the claimed of the size of the universe are estimates because how can we see more than 15 billion light years away.
hope this helps, BT
 
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory has a fine video glossary. Astrophysicist David Schlegel explains about measuring the universe. You can view the video online.:biggrin:
http://videoglossary.lbl.gov/2010/measuring-the-universe/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Great Video
 
Abstract The Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) has significantly advanced our ability to study black holes, achieving unprecedented spatial resolution and revealing horizon-scale structures. Notably, these observations feature a distinctive dark shadow—primarily arising from faint jet emissions—surrounded by a bright photon ring. Anticipated upgrades of the EHT promise substantial improvements in dynamic range, enabling deeper exploration of low-background regions, particularly the inner shadow...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Title: Can something exist without a cause? If the universe has a cause, what caused that cause? Post Content: Many theories suggest that everything must have a cause, but if that's true, then what caused the first cause? Does something need a cause to exist, or is it possible for existence to be uncaused? I’m exploring this from both a scientific and philosophical perspective and would love to hear insights from physics, cosmology, and philosophy. Are there any theories that explain this?
Back
Top