Determining the value of acceleration due to gravity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the acceleration due to gravity using data from a trolley experiment on an air track inclined at 5 degrees. Participants calculated the acceleration using the formula derived from the distance-time relationship, noting that the slope of the graph of distance versus time squared should equal half the acceleration. However, discrepancies arose when determining the experimental value of gravity, with calculated values suggesting a lower acceleration than expected. Potential sources of error discussed include misestimating the angle of inclination and the effects of friction, despite it being negligible on an air track. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurate data interpretation in physics experiments.
Malfunction
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



"The relation between the distanse S of the trolley as it moves on air track and the time t is given by S = Vt+(1/2)at^2, where V is the initial velocity of the trolley. The following set of data were taken for the distance S of a trolley on an air track apparatus, whose angle of inclination is 5 degrees, as a function of time t."

Given data:
S: 0 - 0.15 -0.388 - 0.600 - 0.930 - 1.37 - 2.45
t: 0 - 0.975 - 1.48 - 2.04 - 2.46 - 3.03 - 3.95

The questions:

a-) Calculate t^2 for each case.
b-) Plot a graph of S (y-axis) against t^2 (x-axis)
c-) From the graph determine the magnitude of the acceleration of the trolley.
d-) From the graph, determine the initial velocity of the trolley.


From the above results, determine the experimental value of the acceleration due to gravity.


Homework Equations



s = vi*t + 0.5at^2, where s is the distance, vi is the initial velocity, t is the time, and a is the acceleration.



The Attempt at a Solution



Parts a and b are easy, as you just square t and plot the graph. As for part c, as I recall the slope of a distance against a time squared graph is equal to half the acceleration, and as such the acceleration is equal to 2 times the slope.
As for d, the initial velocity can be determined by the formula given. According to my prof, any value of vi is OK (given the given data is used, obviously).

What I can't get right is the last part, determining the experimental value of acceleration due to gravity. I tried a couple of times, but I keep getting a = 0.30 from the graph, which, when divided by sin of the angle (5 degrees), gives the value 3.44 (a = g*sin (theta)).

What am I doing wrong? Is the acceleration determined in a different way? Does the experimental value really have that big of an error percentage?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Something to consider.. Does the problem state that this is on Earth? :biggrin:

From your data alone, a=2*S/t^2

a=2*0.15/0.975^2 ~ 0.315
a=2*0.388/1.48^2 ~ 0.354
a=2*0.6/2.04^2 ~ 0.288
...
and so on..

even if I take the average of these 3, a~0.319

and a=g*sin(theta) yields g~3.66

So maybe its not on Earth?
 
This is a question on my physics lab report. We did a whole experiment on how to calculate Earth's gravitational acceleration using air tracks, light sensors, etc. As such, it is pretty obvious that the question is asking for Earth's gravitational acceleration. And sadly, this is all the data we have.

Thanks.
 
Malfunction said:
This is a question on my physics lab report. We did a whole experiment on how to calculate Earth's gravitational acceleration using air tracks, light sensors, etc. As such, it is pretty obvious that the question is asking for Earth's gravitational acceleration. And sadly, this is all the data we have.

Thanks.

Well then you have friction to account for, and maybe its not 5 degrees? If it was 2-3 degrees.. then it would make sense
 
Since the trolley is moving on an air track, friction is almost negligible. The angle of inclination is is specifically stated as 5 degrees.

Is the slope of a distance against time squared graph really equal to half of the acceleration?

Thanks.
 
S = \int v dt = \int (v_{initial}+at) dt =
S_{initial} + v_{initial}t + \frac{at^{2}}{2}

2*S=at^{2}
 
Well come to think of it, the problem does ask for Vinitial, so it can't be 0

In that case, S= V*t + 0.5*a*t^2

Which will give you a bunch of linear equations
0 = V*0 + 0.5*a*0
0.15 = V*0.975 + 0.5*a*(0.975)^2
0.388 = V*1.48 + 0.5*a*(1.48)^2
0.600 = V*2.04 + 0.5*a*(2.04)^2
0.930 = V*2.46 + 0.5*a*(2.46)^2
1.37 = V*3.03 + 0.5*a*(3.03)^2
2.45 = V*3.95 + 0.5*a*(3.95)^2
---------------------------------------

7.80125 a+3.95 V = 2.45
4.59045 a+3.03 V = 1.37
3.0258 a+2.46 V = 0.93
2.0808 a+2.04 V = 0.6
1.0952 a+1.48 V = 0.388
0.475312 a+0.975 V = 0.15

Which then reduces to nonlinear least squares problem

[7.80125,3.95;4.59045,3.03;3.0258,2.46;2.0808,2.04;1.0952,1.48;0.475312,0.975]*[a;V] = [2.45; 1.37; 0.93; 0.6;0.388;0.15]

A=[7.80125,3.95;4.59045,3.03;3.0258,2.46;2.0808,2.04;1.0952,1.48;0.475312,0.975]
b=[2.45; 1.37; 0.93; 0.6;0.388;0.15]

Ax=b
x=[a;V]= inverse(transpose(A)*A)*transpose(A)*b

[a;V] = [.3172542164;-0.01304253740]

a=0.32
Vinitial = -0.013

Either that or the more likely problem is that the incline is less than 5 degrees, and there is friction
 
Back
Top