Measuring Distances Across Billions of Light Years

AI Thread Summary
Astronomers utilize type IA supernovae to measure vast cosmic distances and the universe's expansion rate, employing a more complex methodology than just the inverse square law. The process begins with measuring the redshift of light from distant galaxies, which indicates their velocity relative to Earth. Next, the intrinsic brightness of supernovae is regularized, as not all supernovae have the same luminosity; this is correlated with their duration. Finally, General Relativity is applied alongside a model of cosmic expansion to compute the "luminosity distance," which is then compared to the observed brightness to refine the model parameters. This comprehensive approach allows for accurate distance measurements across billions of light years.
superpaul3000
Messages
62
Reaction score
1
I hear a lot about astronomers using type IA supernovae to accurately measure large scale distances over billions of light years to do things like measure the rate of expansion of the universe. I doubt that the calculation of this distance is simply based on the inverse square law. So my question is what other factors are used in calculating that distance? One I can think of off the top of my head is from SR we know that objects traveling quickly away from us have their emitted light red shifted and luminosity reduced. We can see the red shift in these distant galaxies but do the astronomers account for the proper amount of reduction in light intensity when calculating these distances?
 
Space news on Phys.org


I think they are measuring light frequency not light intensity or amplitude.
 


Tanelorn said:
I think they are measuring light frequency not light intensity or amplitude.

I think you can only measure the relative velocity of an object by measuring frequency. Thats how we know that the further away a galaxy is from us the faster it is moving and thus the universe is expanding. However, in order to measure distance you need light intensity, the inverse square law, and some other factors. I guess you would use the frequency to determine velocity and then velocity to determine the expected reduction in brightness. That is what I am trying to confirm. I also want to know if there are additional factors.
 


Brightness is proportional to the inverse of the product D2(1+z)2. However, the "D" here is special: it's the integral from the time the light was emitted to now of (c/a)dt, where "a" is the expansion parameter (a = 1 now, and was <1 at earlier times).
 


superpaul3000 said:
I hear a lot about astronomers using type IA supernovae to accurately measure large scale distances over billions of light years to do things like measure the rate of expansion of the universe. I doubt that the calculation of this distance is simply based on the inverse square law.
Well, yes, it is a bit more complicated than that. Basically, the analysis takes three stages:
1. A redshift is measured. This is relatively easy by looking at specific emission lines, and usually redshifts are very robust.
2. Regularize the supernova. Basically, not all supernovas are the same: some are brighter than others at the source. But fortunately for us, the intrinsic brightness of supernovae appears to be strongly related to other parameters, such as how long they last (brighter supernovae tend to last longer). So empirically we correlate the intrinsic brightness of the supernovae with other estimates.
3. Use General Relativity combined with a model for the expansion to compute how much the supernova will have dimmed based upon its redshift. This calculation is known as the "luminosity distance", and is compared against the measured brightness of the supernova. The comparison between the calculated luminosity distance and the measured brightness is then used to determine the parameters of the model used to calculate the luminosity distance.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top