LaTeX Troubleshooting Latex: Can't Generate Multiple Lines in a Single [tex] Block?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Redbelly98
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Latex Line
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the inability to generate multiple lines within a single [tex] block using the double backslash (\\) command, which is expected to create new lines in LaTeX. Users express frustration that this command does not function as intended on the forum, suggesting it might be a software bug. An alternative solution is proposed using the flalign environment, which allows for proper alignment and new lines through the use of ampersands (&) and suppresses line enumeration with an asterisk. The conversation also touches on the limitations of the eqnarray environment and the nuances of how the forum’s LaTeX implementation interacts with MathJax, leading to confusion about the proper syntax for multi-line equations. Ultimately, users seek clarity on whether new lines can still be generated within a single [tex] block, as previous methods appear ineffective with the current setup.
Redbelly98
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
12,178
Reaction score
186
I can't seem to generate multiple lines within a single [ tex ][ /tex ] block. It's supposed to happen if I type \\ but it just never works for me.

Example:

<br /> f_1(x) = x \\ <br /> f_2(x) = 1-x^2<br />

The "f2(x)" is supposed to start on a new line.

What am I doing wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Redbelly98 said:
I can't seem to generate multiple lines within a single [ tex ][ /tex ] block. It's supposed to happen if I type \\ but it just never works for me.

Example:

<br /> f_1(x) = x \\ <br /> f_2(x) = 1-x^2<br />

The "f2(x)" is supposed to start on a new line.

What am I doing wrong?

Unfortunately I'm not going to be of any help to you. I've also tried this numerous times, but to the same effect.
 
I don't think that the \\ has ever worked on the forums, it must be some kind of bug in the software. However, one can start new lines using the flalign environment.

<br /> \begin{flalign*}<br /> f_1\left(x\right) &amp; = &amp; &amp; x\\<br /> f_2\left(x\right) &amp; = &amp; &amp; 1-x^2\\<br /> f_3\left(x\right) &amp; = &amp; &amp; \frac{f_1}{f_2} \\<br /> &amp; = &amp; &amp; \frac{x}{1-x^2}<br /> \end{flalign*}<br />

And the code:
Code:
\begin{flalign*}
f_1\left(x\right) & = & & x\\
f_2\left(x\right) & = & & 1-x^2\\
f_3\left(x\right) & = & & \frac{f_1}{f_2} \\
& = & & \frac{x}{1-x^2}
\end{flalign*}

The * is used to suppress line enumeration. The alignment of each element is fixed to alternate between left and right as shown below

Code:
\begin{flalign*}
right & left & right & ... \\
right & left & right & ... \\
right & left & right & ... \\
\end{flalign*}

But you can add additional & separators to obtain the desired layout, as I have done above:

Code:
\begin{flalign*}
right & left &  & left \\
right & left &  & left \\
right & left &  & left \\
\end{flalign*}

I agree that this method is far more verbose than simply using \\ is mathmode, but it is the only work-a-round that i know of for PF. Note that the eqnarray environment does not display correctly either at PF.
 
Thanks Hoot. So the &'s help line up the equal signs. And if I just wanted to left-justify each line, each line would start with a &.

Code:
      \begin{flalign*}
      & f_1(x) = x \\ 
      & f_2(x) = 1-x^2
      \end{flalign*}

I also found this previous discussion in a locked thread:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=8997&highlight=latex+line&page=19

However, in chroot's examples the code uses TWO begin and TWO end statements, eg.
\begin{equation*}
\begin{split}

So the single begin statement
\begin{flalign*}
is an improvement over that.

Thanks again!

RB
 
Hootenanny said:
II don't think that the \\ has ever worked on the forums
I've never known it to work in LaTeX either. (Remember that [ itex ] ... [/itex] is analogous to $ ... $, and [ tex ] ... [/tex] is analogous to \[ ... \])
 
Hurkyl said:
I've never known it to work in LaTeX either. (Remember that [ itex ] ... [/itex] is analogous to $ ... $, and [ tex ] ... [/tex] is analogous to \[ ... \])
Hmm, you're quite right: \\ only works in array enviroments in LaTeX :redface:
 
<br /> \]<br /> This is the first line.\\<br /> This is the second line.\\<br /> This is the third line.<br /> \[<br /> E=mc^2<br /> \]<br /> This is another line.<br /> \[<br />

Click on the rendered image to see what I did.
Maybe some \LaTeX expert can explain what is going on.
I suspect that the forum software already places us in a \LaTeX environment... and these \[ \] break us out of it somehow.
 
Last edited:
robphy said:
I suspect that the forum software already places us in a \LaTeX environment... and these \[ \] break us out of it somehow.

Sounds precisely right to me: the tag acts like \[ and by typing \], you close the latex environment.
 
Now that we are using MathJax, I am revisiting how to generate multiple lines within a single LaTeX code block.

EDIT: Nevermind, I found out how to do this: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=261329

Also, scroll down post #1 here for multi-line examples: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=8997

Please disregard the following...[/color]

I just now noticed a problem with these old posts (for example Post #'s 1 and 3 above). Right now I see the LaTeX code, without the [_tex_] tags, enclosed in a box and left-right centered in the page. I have FireFox 4 and Windows 7.

Apparently MathJax doesn't like the double-backslash newline indicator, and that is preventing the code from being processed properly.

Testing:

Using same code from Post #1 again:
<br /> f_1(x) = x \\ <br /> f_2(x) = 1-x^2<br />

Same code, with double-backslash removed:
<br /> f_1(x) = x <br /> f_2(x) = 1-x^2<br />

So the question is, is it possible anymore to generate a new line within the same [_tex_] code block? Hootenanny's trick in Post #3 used to work -- not that I am advocating going back to the old LaTeX system.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Here:
<br /> \begin{align}<br /> a &amp; b \\<br /> c &amp; d<br /> \end{align}<br />

This one gives weird results:
<br /> \begin{multline}<br /> a b \\<br /> c d<br /> \end{multline}<br />
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top