Can AB-BA ever equal the identity matrix?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hamsterman
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that for no matrices A and B, the equation A*B - B*A equals the identity matrix I. Participants explore various approaches, including the use of inverses and determinants, but find challenges in deriving a manageable form. The relationship between determinants when subtraction is involved is questioned, particularly in the context of Sylvester's determinant theorem. The trace of the expression is suggested as a potential avenue for proof, leading to the conclusion that tr(AB-BA) equals zero. The conversation highlights the complexity of matrix operations and the intricacies of linear algebra.
hamsterman
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
The task is to prove that for no two matrices A and B, A*B - B*A = I, where I is the identity matrix.
I tried multiplying by the inverses of A or B, but that doesn't seem to lead to a more manageable form. The only way I see this could be done is by writing down all n*n (assuming n by n matrices) linear equations. It's easy to do when n = 2, but the same contradiction may not be as obvious for higher n.
I hope there is a more intelligent way to go about this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you know about determinants?
 
I know that det(AB) = det(BA), but I don't know what are the properties when subtraction is involved. Except for the case when only one line is different.
 
hamsterman said:
I know that det(AB) = det(BA), but I don't know what are the properties when subtraction is involved.

Determinant is just a number, isn't it?
 
What I mean is that I don't know what is det(AB-BA) even if I do know det(AB) and det(BA).
I'm looking at Sylvester's determinant theorem which looks related, but I still don't see a solution. Now I need to prove that for no M, det(M+I) = det(M)[STRIKE], at least when M = AB..[/STRIKE] (now that I think about it, there is probably no matrix that can't be written as a product of two others, is there?)
 
hamsterman said:
What I mean is that I don't know what is det(AB-BA) even if I do know det(AB) and det(BA).
I'm looking at Sylvester's determinant theorem which looks related, but I still don't see a solution. Now I need to prove that for no M, det(M+I) = det(M)[STRIKE], at least when M = AB..[/STRIKE] (now that I think about it, there is probably no matrix that can't be written as a product of two others, is there?)

Try taking the trace.
 
So tr(AB-BA) = 0 ? Great. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

Replies
69
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top