What is magnetic flux and magnetic flux density? Please keep it simple.

AI Thread Summary
Magnetic flux is defined as the total number of magnetic field lines passing through a given area, measured in Webers. Magnetic flux density, or magnetic field strength, quantifies the number of these lines per square meter, expressed in Tesla. The relationship between magnetic flux and flux density is given by the formula ∅ = B x A, where ∅ is flux, B is flux density, and A is the area. The strength of a magnetic field is indicated by how closely the lines of force are packed together, with more lines per area signifying a stronger field. Understanding these concepts is essential for A-level physics studies.
martin glen
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Im revising for my A levels and I could really do with a simple, straight forward definition for magnetic flux and magnetic flux density. Can anyone please help? I'd be very grateful.

F=BIl

∅=BA
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you seen diagrams of magnetic fields or iron filings representations of magnetic fields?
They are represented by 'lines of force', these lines of force are given a unit in physics... they are called Webers and the lines of force are known as the 'flux'.
In these magnetic field pictures the strong part of the field is near the magnet poles where the lines(flux ,Webers) are close together, so strength is something to do with how close the lines (Webers) are. The more lines per square metre (Webers per squ metre) the stronger the magnet.
Webers per square metre is given a special name 'magnetic flux density' known as magnetic field strength. It is measured in Webers per square metre which is given a special name... Tesla... we love to commemorate physicists in physics by naming units after them.
So... flux (phi) represents 'number of lines' measured in Webers
Flux density B is 'number of lines/m^2...webers/m^2 or Tesla
so flux = B x A ... Webers = Tesla x m^2
Horrible, confusing mixture of units... hope this helps
 
Yeah that does help a lot, thank you!
 
so beautifully replied
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top