Solving Linear Equations (fractions)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the linear equation 2(x-1)/3 = (x/4)+1 by multiplying both sides by 12 to eliminate fractions. The concept of the Lowest Common Denominator (LCD) is explained, identifying 12 as the LCD for 3 and 4, which simplifies the equation effectively. Participants clarify the multiplication of fractions and the rules governing them, emphasizing how to manipulate equations to isolate variables. Additionally, there is a discussion about the equality of fractions, concluding that if two fractions are equal, their denominators must also be equal. Overall, the conversation provides a thorough understanding of fraction manipulation in linear equations.
annalise17
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I'm taking a step back as I've found a concept I'm struggling with. If I have an equation:

2(x-1)/3 = (x/4)+1

I've been told I need to multiply by 12 to give me:

8(x-1) = 3x+12

However I'm struggling with the multiplication of fractions in his instance. Can anyone advise me how that calculation works? I understand the remainder of the working. Thanks :)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Do you remember the rules of fractions?

If you have some fraction, say, \frac{2}{3} and you multiply it by 9, there are various ways to represent the same number. You could have:

=9\cdot \frac{2}{3} (note, the dot just means multiply, as x could be confused with a variable)

=\frac{9\cdot 2}{3}

=\frac{18}{3}

=\frac{9}{3}\cdot 2

=3\cdot 2

=6

Now notice the expression \frac{9}{3}\cdot 2=3\cdot 2. We essentially cancel out the denominator this way, which is what you're trying to do in your problem.

So why do we multiply your question by 12 and not just any other number? Well, what we're looking for is something called the Lowest Common Denominator (LCD) of 3 and 4. What this means is that we want the first number that both 3 and 4 multiply into.

Multiples of 3:
3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, ...

Multiples of 4:
4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, ...

Notice the common multiples are 12 and 24. But we want the LCD which would be 12.

So now when you multiply \frac{2(x-1)}{3} by 12, you get 12\cdot \frac{2(x-1)}{3}=\frac{12}{3}\cdot 2(x-1)=4\cdot 2(x-1)=8(x-1)

and if you multiply the other side by 12, you get 12\left(\frac{x}{4}+1\right)=\frac{12x}{4}+12=3x+12

Just remember the common rules of fractions:

a\cdot\frac{b}{c}=\frac{ab}{c}=\frac{a}{c}\cdot b=a\cdot b\cdot\frac{1}{c}

etc.
 
That's great thank you :) Following on from that I know that Y/x1 = y/x2 cancels down to give x1 = x2 but can you explain why?
 
annalise17 said:
That's great thank you :) Following on from that I know that Y/x1 = y/x2 cancels down to give x1 = x2 but can you explain why?

Can you multiply the left side of the equation with x1 and simultaneously also multiply the right side with x1?

After that multiply left and right with x2.

And finally divide left and right by y.
 
annalise17 said:
That's great thank you :) Following on from that I know that Y/x1 = y/x2 cancels down to give x1 = x2 but can you explain why?

What I like Serena said.

Also, you can think of it logically. If \frac{2}{x}=\frac{2}{y} then for these to be equal, don't x and y need to be the same?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top