Confusion about synchronization

mananvpanchal
Messages
215
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Suppose, in moving train Observer O is at middle point M, and two clocks is situated at A(rear) and B(front). O has a clock.

I have confusion about time of A and B after synchronization.

I have two scenario, please, tell me which one is right.

(1) If we assume that one way speed of light is same for all.
So, there is no problem if frame is moving or not.

Suppose, light signal takes 2 sec to reach at end and 2 sec for coming back. Using the equation t=t_1+(t_2-t_1)/2 we can calculate t=2. So we send "2" signal at t_o=0.

t_o=0, t_a=?, t_b=?
t_o=1, t_a=?, t_b=?
t_o=2, t_a=2, t_b=2
t_o=3, t_a=3, t_b=3
t_o=4, t_a=4, t_b=4


(2) If we assume that one way speed of light is not same for all, then motion of frame matters. Suppose, light signal takes 1 sec to reach at A and 3 sec for coming back, 3 sec to reach at B and 1 sec for coming back. Using the same equation we can calculate t=2. So we send "2" signal at t_o=0.

t_o=0, t_a=?, t_b=?
t_o=1, t_a=2, t_b=?
t_o=2, t_a=3, t_b=?
t_o=3, t_a=4, t_b=2
t_o=4, t_a=5, t_b=3

Please, tell me which is right. If both wrong then please tell me how to synchronize clocks in moving frame.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mananvpanchal said:
Please, tell me which is right. If both wrong then please tell me how to synchronize clocks in moving frame.
Both are right. You just have one more simultaneity "plane" in addition to simultaneity of train clocks and it is different in cases (1) and (2). In case (1) this simultaneity "plane" is the same as for train clocks. In case (2) this simultaneity "plane" is skewed in respect to train clocks.

Basically it looks like you are asking how to determine preferred frame. But relativity does not provide any means how to do that. So either you assume it in arbitrary fashion or do without it.

And maybe this can help Relativity of simultaneity
 
zonde said:
Both are right. You just have one more simultaneity "plane" in addition to simultaneity of train clocks and it is different in cases (1) and (2). In case (1) this simultaneity "plane" is the same as for train clocks. In case (2) this simultaneity "plane" is skewed in respect to train clocks.

Basically it looks like you are asking how to determine preferred frame. But relativity does not provide any means how to do that. So either you assume it in arbitrary fashion or do without it.

And maybe this can help Relativity of simultaneity

Thanks for reply

Yes, I was confused that which synchronization is right for train frame.
 
Last edited:
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top