Difference between force and energy.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the distinction between force, energy, and momentum in physics, particularly in relation to electromagnetism. It clarifies that force is a vector quantity related to the change in energy when an object moves, while energy is a scalar that does not have direction. The conversation also addresses how momentum relates to kinetic energy and velocity, emphasizing that momentum is also a vector. A key point of confusion is the behavior of photons, which have momentum despite having zero mass, with their energy determined by wavelength and frequency rather than mass. The explanation concludes that photons are treated as electromagnetic waves, which accounts for their unique properties.
suchal
Messages
32
Reaction score
1
I guess my tittle is self explanatory, but I see energy's concept of relativity not of "ability to do anything".
if electromagnetism a force, then why some people say it is energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Electromagnetism is a phenomenon. It involves momentum, force, energy, space and time. Energy and force have very specific meanings.

In most general terms when a system can move or change (translate through space, rotate, deform, etc.) A force relates the amount of energy expended (or gained) when one moves the system a given (small) distance. If you push on an object with a certain force F over a certain distance \Delta x the object gains Kinetic energy by the amount F\cdot \Delta x. Note direction and +/- signs matter here. Throw a rock up (positive direction) and the downward (negative) force is opposite the upward motion so it gains negative kinetic energy (looses kinetic energy) and slows.

If you can move an object in many directions it is easier to express the components of force in each direction as a single vector force with direction and magnitude. This vector will point in the direction in which the object gains the most energy for a given amount of motion and the magnitude corresponds to the energy per distance in that direction.

Note that while force can have a direction, energy does not. Energy is a scalar while force is a vector quantity.

Another important quantity is momentum. Momentum relates a (small) change in kinetic energy to a small change in velocity when considering a system changing position over time. Now momentum itself depends on velocity so you'll see a factor of 1/2 in formulas for kinetic energy.
KE = \frac{1}{2} m v^2=\frac{1}{2}pv, where p = mv
\Delta KE = \frac{1}{2}\Delta p \cdot v + \frac{1}{2}p\cdot \Delta v = \frac{1}{2}(2 m v \Delta v) = p\Delta v
(here the \Delta symbol means "change in").

Note that again momentum is a vector quantity as is velocity.

This gives another interpretation of a force as the rate of change of momentum of an object. When momentum is velocity times (a constant) mass you get Newton's F = ma where a is the acceleration (rate of change of velocity).

We can generalize these to rotary motion and speak of rotary force (torque) as the amount of work done per angle we turn an object and the rotary momentum (angular momentum) as the rate of change in kinetic energy as we change speed of rotation.
 
thank you very much. I got it. Just one confusion is there, when p=mv2 then why a photon for which m=0 has p>0 and it's E==KE but depends on it's wavelength and frequency?
 
suchal said:
thank you very much. I got it. Just one confusion is there, when p=mv2 then why a photon for which m=0 has p>0 and it's E==KE but depends on it's wavelength and frequency?

The photon's energy and momentum are not determined by it's mass. Instead see here for how to determine the photons energy and momentum: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon#Physical_properties
As for the why, I believe it is because it is an electromagnetic wave, not a particle with mass.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top