Accelerating charged particles emit EM waves?

AI Thread Summary
Accelerating charged particles, such as electrons, do emit electromagnetic (EM) waves, even when their speed increases in one dimension. The electric and magnetic fields associated with the electron change over time due to its acceleration, which leads to radiation. While there are misconceptions about the nature of the electric field and its behavior, the key point is that an accelerating charge radiates, regardless of whether the acceleration involves changing direction or speed. The relationship between the changing magnetic field and the induced electric field is also significant in this context. Overall, the discussion clarifies that acceleration, not just alternating current, is essential for EM wave emission.
plazprestige
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
I know that if you have alternating current in a wire, it will produce electromagnetic waves since the electric and magnetic field change direction continuously as the wave propagates, and that the wave direction, orientation of the E component, and orientation of the B component will all be mutually perpendicular.

However, this acceleration arises from changing direction of charged particles, not speed.

My question is this:

If I were to accelerate an electron by increasing its speed in one dimension (+x), would that electron emit EM waves?


The electron will have a constant electric field pointing towards itself, and its magnetic field will be going into the page in the 1st quadrant and going out of the page in the 4th quadrant, and the magnitude of the magnetic field will be increasing.

I can visualize the mutually perpendicular B and E waves, but they would not be changing orientation continuously since it isn't AC current. Would this still be an EM wave?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello,

The answer to your question in bold is: yes!
(For the case of uniform acceleration (at all times!) it's a bit controversial, the theory is not clear on its prediction, or perhaps it depends on what you mean by radiation in that case, but the example is pathological so never mind for now)

Generally: an accelerating charge radiates.

I don't really follow what you say next though. I think you're having some misconceptions. For example "The electron will have a constant electric field pointing towards itself" is not really correct: the electric field is retarded (due to the fact that the electric field spreads out at a finite speed), e.g. see http://www.cco.caltech.edu/~phys1/java/phys1/MovingCharge/MovingCharge.html

Also "but they would not be changing orientation continuously" doesn't sound correct: the electric field and magnetic field are changing in time, aren't they? This is simply due to their source changing in time.
 
I'm a bit confused then. An electron will have electric field lines pointing toward itself (since convention has positive test charges in the field). As the electron speeds up, its electric field will not change directly since its charge is the same, but its magnetic field will increase in magnitude.

Would this increasing magnetic field induce an increasing electric field?

Even if the answer to the above is yes, I still do not see how an electron simply speeding up will produce EM waves in the nature of which alternating current produces EM waves.
 
"I'm a bit confused then. An electron will have electric field lines pointing toward itself"

Did you not fully read my last point? I addressed this misconception.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top