Would a moving scale read more than a scale at rest?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Isaiah Gray
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rest Scale
Isaiah Gray
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Assuming there is a mass on a scale, and they move with the same velocity. I know mass increases for a moving object, but the scale's mass will also increase. So would the scale read any more than if they were both at rest?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
According to the scale the mass is at rest, so no the scale will not read any more.
 
Suppose the scale has a display that reads 1.0000 kg for a certain object, when you're at rest with respect to the scale (e.g. standing next to it in the laboratory). Now imagine running past the scale at 0.9c. Surely the reading is still 1.0000 kg.
 
Maybe the OP is thinking that if you run by the scale at 0.9c you would expect to observe a relativistic mass increase of the mass on the scale, the scale itself, and the Earth for that matter such that if the scale was a spring scale the indicator would shift reading due to additional compression between the mass on the scale and the Earth under the scale.

Something tells me that there may be a problem with using a spring scale here... similar to the way relativistic experiments need to exclude certain forms of clocks like pendulum clocks?
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top