How Dangerous Are Free Radicals from Ionizing Radiation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CloudChamber
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Health Radiation
AI Thread Summary
Free radicals generated by ionizing radiation are dangerous due to their highly reactive nature, which leads to a self-propagating chain reaction that can cause significant cellular damage, including mitochondrial interference and protein damage. This occurs because free radicals seek to stabilize themselves by stealing electrons from other molecules, creating new free radicals in the process. Antioxidants play a crucial role in counteracting this damage by donating electrons to free radicals without becoming reactive themselves. This ability of antioxidants to stabilize free radicals helps protect cells from the harmful effects of ionizing radiation. Understanding these mechanisms is vital for developing strategies to mitigate radiation-induced health risks.
CloudChamber
Messages
28
Reaction score
1
Hello All,
Can anyone explain why free radicals caused by ionizing radiation can be so dangerous to our health? In addition, does there seem to be any plausible way to counteract or at least prevent this damage?
Thanks!
CloudChamber
 
  • Like
Likes solidarityincrimson
Biology news on Phys.org
CloudChamber said:
Hello All,
Can anyone explain why free radicals caused by ionizing radiation can be so dangerous to our health? In addition, does there seem to be any plausible way to counteract or at least prevent this damage?
Thanks!
CloudChamber


Free radicals are highly reactive species. That is because they contain at least one unpaired electron in their valence shells and hence try to take electrons with opposite spin from different molecules in the cell. And while the free radical satisfies itself by taking electrons from a different molecule it has produced a new free radical. Therefore once a free radical is formed it enters a self-propagating chain reaction, and this could last for thousands of exchanges until something called termination happens. This can cause some serious cellular damage, ranging from interfering with respiration in the mitochondria to protein damage.

Antioxidants counter this free radical damage in cells. They can donate electrons to the free radical but don't turn into one themselves because they can be pretty stable without them as well.
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...
Back
Top