Which Abstract Algebra Textbook is Best for Self-Study?

AI Thread Summary
When choosing a textbook for self-study in abstract algebra, the discussion highlights two main options: Artin's Algebra and Dummit and Foote's Abstract Algebra. Artin's book is praised for its clarity and powerful insights, with a focus on rigorous proof techniques suitable for advanced learners, particularly those at the MIT level. In contrast, while Dummit and Foote also provide clear explanations and a strong selection of problems, some users find their approach to proofs less helpful for understanding. Dummit and Foote cover additional topics like tensor algebra that Artin omits. A recommendation is made to explore both texts to determine which aligns better with the learner's style, suggesting that starting with Dummit and Foote could be beneficial before transitioning to Artin's work.
kostas230
Messages
96
Reaction score
3
I need to buy a textbook for self study in abstract algebra for self study. Although I'm a physics major, I have lot's of experience with proof. I'm between Artin's Algebra and Dummit's Abstract Algebra. Which one do you recommend?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Artin is in many ways superior to Dummit and Foote.
 
micromass said:
Artin is in many ways superior to Dummit and Foote.

In what ways exactly?
 
Well Mike Artin is a very famous world class algebraist/algebraic geometer.

His insights and arguments are very clear and powerful.

Dummitt and Foote also has some very clear expositions an excellent selection of problems, but i myself disagree with their philosophy of explanation.

it doesn't hurt to consult both books.

What bothered me about Dummitt and Foote waS A TENDENCY TO GIVE PROOFS THAT WERE unhelpful for understanding or calculation, and put the more helpful approaches in the problem sets.

No doubt Dummitt and Foote are strong algebraists, but Mike Artin is, in my opinion, on a very special and elite level. His book gives you the course for MIT sophomores.

Dummitt and Foote does cover some topics omitted from Artin, like tensor algebra.

Why don't you read a bit of both of them and see which suits you better? if you find you prfer Dummitt and Foote, then use that to learn, and I suggest graduaTING TO Artin later.

What do you say micromass?
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
7K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
5K
Back
Top