How to show that light travels through space, but not time

  • Thread starter Thread starter relativ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Space Time
AI Thread Summary
Light travels through space but not through time, as demonstrated by relativistic equations like the Lorentz factor (γ). The discussion highlights the challenge of understanding how to apply these equations to show that as a particle approaches the speed of light (c), time dilation occurs, leading to a scenario where time effectively stops for light. By comparing time intervals in different reference frames, it becomes evident that an observer would perceive an infinite wait for a clock carried by a particle traveling at the speed of light to tick. This raises questions about the nature of time for theoretical particles moving at light speed. The participant expresses uncertainty but intends to seek further clarification from their teacher.
relativ
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Use relativistic equations and γ to demonstrate the following:
b) Light travels through space but not in time

Homework Equations


Lorentz factor γ = 1 / √(1 - [v/c]^2)

Time dilation t = γ t°

Length contraction L = γ L°

Mass relativity m = γ m°

E = m c^2

The Attempt at a Solution



To be honest, I'm not exactly sure how to approach this. I don't quite understand the concept behind what the question is really asking for. Furthermore, I don't know how I can use these equations to prove that light does not travel through time.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider a particle traveling at a uniform velocity relative to the observer. Compare a fixed time interval t0, perhaps 1 second, in that particle's reference frame to the corresponding time interval in the observer's reference frame. Ie., pretend the particle is carrying a clock that ticks once every second.
How long does the observer have to wait to observe one tick if the particle travels at 0.9c ? At 0.95c? At 0.99c? 0.999c?
Does this behavior continue if we make the fixed unit of time for a single tick smaller? What does this imply about theoretical particles carrying these same clocks that travel at c?
With the formulas you have, you can only make a weak implication.
 
slider142 said:
Consider...
Thank you. I can't quite wrap my head around this, but I think I have a good enough idea to somehow explain this. I'll be sure to ask my teacher when I can.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top