What should we call other universes besides 'parallel universes'?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Imranfish
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parallel Universe
AI Thread Summary
The term "parallel universes" is rooted in historical naming conventions and reflects the theoretical framework of these universes as n-dimensional surfaces in higher-dimensional space. Suggestions for alternative names include "skew universe," "ewniverse," and "boogiverse," highlighting the playful nature of naming in theoretical discussions. The conversation emphasizes the importance of having distinct names for these concepts, as they exist primarily as ideas. Ultimately, the naming of such universes remains subjective and open to creative interpretation. The discussion illustrates the blend of scientific theory and linguistic creativity in conceptualizing other universes.
Imranfish
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Why is other universes called "parallel universes." Why don't we call it something else like skew universe?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Imranfish said:
Why is other universes called "parallel universes." Why don't we call it something else like skew universe?

Why do we call the color of grass "green"?
 
Far worse names must include planetary nebula (no planets there) or spectrsopic parallax ( no parallax measurements taken). but we live with the name for historic reasons kind of like all language and names.
 
The naming also probably comes from the "theory" that they're parallel n-th dimensional surfaces in an n+1-st dimensional space, where n is just for the sake of example (though it could be 3 or 4, depending on whether we're talking about the "whole" Universe or the Universe at a single point in time wrt one reference frame, or perhaps more if the Universe has more dimensions)
 
Imranfish said:
Why is other universes called "parallel universes." Why don't we call it something else like skew universe?

Sounds like a constructive suggestion. They exist as concepts, so have a name for them.
Maybe in line with your idea call them "skewniverse", for short.

Or even shorter and easier to write, call these imaginary concepts "ewniverse"

or, to emphasize the fantasy aspect: "boogiverse". :biggrin:

I like it. Thanks Imranfish. Welcome to PF!
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top