Electron mass in a Kondo lattice

SW VandeCarr
Messages
2,193
Reaction score
77
I'm not a physicist, but I always thought that the rest mass of the electron was a physical constant and its apparent mass was only affected by relativistic effects. This abstract discusses heavy electrons in a Kondo lattice. In what sense are these electrons "heavy"? At low temperatures, they apparently behave as "fast" electrons, which I would think would only be "massive" in a relativistic sense. There seems to be something else going on here. Can someone explain? Thanks.

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v486/n7402/full/nature11204.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
In a crystal the electrons interact very strongly. As a result you cannot move a single electron without affecting a whole bunch of others. The net effect is that the physics is best described by "elementary excitations" and "quasi-particles". The best example is a hole, which behaves pretty much like a positron, but really is just a missing electron in an otherwise full band.

If you have a band that is mostly empty, then you get quasiparticles that look just like electrons but with an effective mass that is given by the curvature of the band. In common usage, they are just referred to as electrons.

In Heavy Fermion systems, the conduction bands can be nearly flat. This gives rise to electron-like quasiparticles with a very high effective mass.

This is derived from E=p^2/2m where E is the energy ,p = \hbar k is the momentum and m is the effective mass. If the band is flat then E is small even for large k, and thus m has to be large.
 
Thanks M Quack for the clear explanation. These are clearly different from free electrons and seem to be composites if I can use that word. I'm wondering if these are in any way similar to condensates at very low temperatures where a single wave function can describe a number of particles.
 
Yes, similar in principle but different in the details. For crystals you also have to find many-electron wave functions that describe all electrons at the same time.
 
SW VandeCarr said:
I'm not a physicist, but I always thought that the rest mass of the electron was a physical constant and its apparent mass was only affected by relativistic effects. This abstract discusses heavy electrons in a Kondo lattice. In what sense are these electrons "heavy"? At low temperatures, they apparently behave as "fast" electrons, which I would think would only be "massive" in a relativistic sense. There seems to be something else going on here. Can someone explain? Thanks.

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v486/n7402/full/nature11204.html

The dispersion relation can be used to convert the energy of a hole or electron in the conduction band of a semiconductor to an effective mass. You basically Taylor expand about the wavenumber value that gives the energy minimum of the conduction band. Then you take the second order term, and define m^{*}=\frac{\hbar^{2}}{1}\frac{1}{\frac{ \partial ^{2}E}{\partial k^{2}}} to be the effective mass. It's a mathematical way to say that the electrons or holes in the lattice behave like a free gas of electrons or holes would if each particle had an effective mass corresponding to their value for m^{*}.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you both for your explanations.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top