Is There a Name for This Theorem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dschumanji
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether there is a theorem stating that if b divides a squared (b|a²), then b must also divide a (b|a) for integers a and b. It is clarified that this implication is not generally true, as demonstrated by the example of 9 dividing 36 but not dividing 6. The condition for the implication to hold is that b must be a prime number or have no repeated prime factors. The validity of the statement can be proven using Euclid's lemma, which confirms that if b is prime and divides a², then it must also divide a. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the specific conditions under which the theorem applies.
Dschumanji
Messages
153
Reaction score
1
Is there a theorem that says when b|a2 → b|a is true for integers a and b?

If so, what is it called?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I hope not, since it isn't generally true. 9|36, but not 9|6. You would need that b is a prime (or at least, has no repeated prime factors).
 
OP, did you mean to reverse those...?

b|a \; \rightarrow \; b|a^{2}

Is certainly true.
 
Last edited:
daniel.e2718 said:
Is certainly true.

But it's hardly worth calling it a theorem, since it's just a special case of ##b|a \rightarrow b|ac##.
 
Dschumanji said:
Is there a theorem that says when b|a2 → b|a is true for integers a and b?

If so, what is it called?

That is true whenever b is prime. You can prove it by using euclid's lemma.

Let b be prime. Suppose b|a2. Then b|aa, and, by euclid's lemma, b|a or b|a. Hence b|a.
 
The statement holds true whenever |\mu(b)|=1.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
38
Views
4K
3
Replies
105
Views
6K
Replies
72
Views
7K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Back
Top