Can Mathematical Axioms and Postulates Prove That 1+1 Equals 2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter richardnub
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Mathematical axioms and postulates can be used to define addition, particularly through the concept of succession in natural numbers. By defining an operation that identifies the "next" number in a set, one can establish a framework for addition without initially labeling it as such. This leads to the conclusion that 1+1 equals 2 through repeated succession. While set theory isn't necessary for this basic proof, it can help validate the rules of integer addition. Ultimately, one can also define the number 2 as the result of 1+1.
richardnub
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Is there some axiom or postulate that defines addition?

I've always wondered this.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well, when you get to that level it becomes rather difficult. I believe that if you define the natural numbers as an ordered set, you can define an operation on them that essentially says "go to the 'next' number in the set", which we can call "succession" and denote as s(n), where n is a natural number. In normal terms, s(n)=n+1, but since we haven't defined "addition" yet, we can't really call it that yet. Then, you can define addition as repeated succession in some way, and from there define 1+1 and find it to be equal to 2.

At least, I think the above method can work. Obviously someone better than I would have to come along and codify it.
 
You do not really need to delve into set theory, unless you want to prove that the rules we set up for integer addition follow from the rules we have from set axioms (i.e, mathematical reductionism).

You can, of course, DEFINE 2 to be equal to 1+1.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top