Simplifying equations. Orders of operation.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Iccanui
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Simplifying
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around simplifying the expression (2+1×2)−4×6, with the correct answer being -20. Participants emphasize the importance of following the order of operations (BIDMAS/BODMAS), which dictates that brackets are calculated first, followed by multiplication and then subtraction. Confusion arises from the expression's ambiguity, leading to mistakes in interpreting the subtraction. Clarification is provided that subtraction should be approached from left to right, which is crucial for accurate calculations. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for clear mathematical expressions to avoid misunderstandings.
Iccanui
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Simplify the following expression.

(2+1×2)−4×6
=(2+2)−4×6
=4−4×6
=4−24
=−20
My answer was 20 and it was wrong.

When i look at this i see, 2 plus 1 times 2 minus 4 times 6
The part I am getting wrong is the minus, which in this case means a -4 instead of a 4.
I don't understand how you can you tell the difference ?
My only conclusion is that since this is a order of operations module, that this doesn't really exist outside of the module, that its just a example for learning ?
Or maybe since its saying to simplyify the expresion, that right there is telling me that I am not going to add or subtract some how ?

Thanks for any advice in advance
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Iccanui said:
Simplify the following expression.

(2+1×2)−4×6
=(2+2)−4×6
=4−4×6
=4−24
=−20

My answer was 20 and it was wrong.
This should do it :biggrin:
 
The generally accepted order of operations are BIDMAS (or BODMAS, same thing), which is:
Brackets, Indicies, Division and Multiplication, Addition and Subtraction.

So, brackets are computed first, then indices (powers), then division and multiplication have equal priority, and are done left to right, then addition and subtraction, which also have equal priority, are done left to right.

In real life, nobody should write anything as ambiguous as this, because it just causes problems. (2 + (1 × 2)) - (4 × 6) would be a far better way to write it.
 
acabus said:
The generally accepted order of operations are BIDMAS (or BODMAS, same thing), which is:
Brackets, Indicies, Division and Multiplication, Addition and Subtraction.

So, brackets are computed first, then indices (powers), then division and multiplication have equal priority, and are done left to right, then addition and subtraction, which also have equal priority, are done left to right.

In real life, nobody should write anything as ambiguous as this, because it just causes problems. (2 + (1 × 2)) - (4 × 6) would be a far better way to write it.

Ahh ok i get it now.

Couldnt wrap my head around it or a second. Thank you. :)
 
Iccanui said:
acabus said:
The generally accepted order of operations are BIDMAS (or BODMAS, same thing), which is:
Brackets, Indicies, Division and Multiplication, Addition and Subtraction.

So, brackets are computed first, then indices (powers), then division and multiplication have equal priority, and are done left to right, then addition and subtraction, which also have equal priority, are done left to right.

In real life, nobody should write anything as ambiguous as this, because it just causes problems. (2 + (1 × 2)) - (4 × 6) would be a far better way to write it.
Ahh ok i get it now.

Couldnt wrap my head around it or a second. Thank you. :)
I don't get it. Why is given expression ambiguous and why is your answer wrong?
 
I still don't get it. I'd bet everything that the expression evaluates to -20.
 
It does = -20

What I was doing was subtracting wrong.

I think my failure came from forgetting that you always go left to right, no matter what. I think I automatically subtracted 4 from 24 when what it's really saying is 24 from 4. In other terms, I was thinking 24-4 and it's plainly saying 4-24.

Yes, I'm very certain this is what happened. But to acabus point, had there been a parentheses around the 4x6 it would have been a little more clear. Which makes me feel better lol.

It's amazing all the reflexive math I'm running into. I never dealt with negative numbers in the jobs I've had, so when I see numbers like that, if I'm not slowing my mind down and thinking, I instinctively subtract small numbers from big numbers. Embarrassing to admit, but what can I say, I grew up how I grew up. I'm just glad I get a chance to advance my math to a functional level now. I just wish 15 year old me knew how cool math is. No one told me I could use it to fly to the moon or mars, or understand how the universe works, how planets and stars move in the sky. I might have paid more attention if they had.Hope that helps.
 
Integral said:
Please read this.


Thank you, that helped me understand acabus better. And a lesson for any expressions I right myself.
 
Back
Top