Time Dilation - Clock running slower?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of time dilation as observed by two observers: one on a moving train and one stationary on a platform. The stationary observer perceives the moving observer's clock as ticking slower due to the effects of relativity, which can be confusing when considering their own clock's measurements. Both observers will actually see the other's clock ticking slower, highlighting the relativity of simultaneity and the absence of an absolute rate of time. The term "proper time" is clarified as a technical term in relativity without implying a definitive reality. Understanding these principles is essential for grasping the nuances of time dilation.
Peter G.
Messages
439
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am having a hard time understanding one thing about this experiment for Time Dilation.

I have one observer on a moving train measuring the time it takes for light to travel a distance d and be reflected back and one observer who is stationary, watching the same events.

I understand the man on the platform does not measure proper time and, hence, measures a dilated time period.

However, my book says that the man on the platform sees the clock held by the man on the train tick slower.

Shouldn't it be the opposite? For a fixed interval on the watch of the man on the platform, the watch on the train will have measured an inferior time period if it ticks slower, as if time had contracted, no?

Or is the book referring to the fact that the man on the platform sees the time measured by the observer on the train? In that case the watch on the train seems to tick slower because the stationary observer's watch is ticking faster?

Can anyone help me please!

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Both observers will see the other's clock tick slower.
There is no true rate of time. "proper" is a technical term in relativity and should not be considered to have any special significance in terms of what is "really" happening.
 
Ok, thanks
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top