Calculating Force Using Coulomb's Law

AI Thread Summary
Understanding Coulomb's Law involves applying the equation F = (1/4 x π x ε) x (q1 x q2/r²), where ε is the electrical permittivity. For hypothetical charges of 2 C and 4 C at a distance of 20 meters, the radial distance is considered the radius of a circle, simplifying the calculation. The electrical permittivity value of 8.854 x 10^-12 is specific to a vacuum, and different materials have different permittivity values. The units of permittivity (F/m) are essential for deriving the force in Newtons when using SI units. Ultimately, the discussion clarifies how to properly apply the formula and the significance of unit consistency in calculations.
DB
Messages
501
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble understanding how to apply the Coulomb's law equation.

F=(1/4 x pi x epsilon) x (q1 x q2/r2)

I know this much:
F(Newtons)= {1\4 x pi x [8.854 x 10 - 12 Flow / m] (electrical permittivity)}
x
charge of particle 1 x charge of particle 2/r2 (their distance squared)

Let's say we have two hypothetical particles: 1 with charge 2 C and the other 4 C, they are at a distance of 20 meters apart. I just don't see how to apply this info, would you have to place circle around the 2 particle so that they are at a diameter of 20 apart? If so, then let the radius be 10. Then what? :eek:

Thnx to anyone who helps o:)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
F= \frac{|qQ|}{4r^2 \pi \epsilon }

Just plug in for your hypothetical case:

F= \frac{-|2C*4C|}{4 (20)^2 \pi \epsilon } (minus sign becuase like repell.)

r is the radial distance between the two points. That just means the distance between them can be thought of as the radius of a circle.
 
Last edited:
wow, it seems so simple know lol, thnx but when you mutiply by electrical permittivity do you just multiply by 8.854 x 10 -12, what happens to the F/m? is it just ignored?
 
The electrical permitivity depends on the type of material you have. The constant you just gave me is for a vaccuum. You can probably find a table in a book somewhere for values in different materials. The permitivity is the value you use for the \epsilon. As for F/m, I don't understand your question I am sorry.
 
Last edited:
DB said:
wow, it seems so simple know lol, thnx but when you mutiply by electrical permittivity do you just multiply by 8.854 x 10 -12, what happens to the F/m? is it just ignored?

Farad/m is the unit of the permittivity, and it is not ignored, but together with the other units - unit of charge, unit of length it makes the unit of force, Newton (N). But this happens automatically if you use the SI units.

Lets see what is the dimension of (charge^2)/(permittivity*length^2)?

\frac {A^2\cdot s^2 }{(F/m) \cdot m^2} =( \frac{As}{m}) (\frac {Q}{F}) = \frac{V \cdot A \cdot s}{m}= \frac{J}{m} = N

It has been used that charge = current *time, capacitance = charge/voltage, and power = current* voltage,
work = power *time, work = force * length.

ehild
 
thnx got it
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...

Similar threads

Replies
44
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
42
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
2K
Back
Top