Stiffness Equation for Spring Dimensions: How is it Derived?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ajd-brown
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation
AI Thread Summary
The stiffness equation for a spring, k=(Gd^4)/(8D^3 n), relates the shear constant, wire diameter, coil diameter, and number of active coils. A user seeks help in deriving this equation for a university project, emphasizing the importance of proper referencing. Suggestions include consulting mechanics of materials textbooks, specifically works by Singer and Hearn, for derivation guidance. Additional resources, like a specific online reference, are provided to aid understanding. The discussion highlights the balance between academic research and personal learning in engineering studies.
ajd-brown
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Equation attached.

For those who can't see the image here it is in text form, k=(Gd^4)/(8D^3 n )

It is the equation for the stiffness of a spring in terms of its dimensions:

G - shear constant
d - wire diameter
D - coil average diameter
n - number of active coils (total coils -2 as the top and bottom coils are not considered active)

I would like to know how to derive this equation as it is a big chunk of my project,

I am doing this as part of a university project, and your derivation will be duly noted/referenced.

Thanks in advance!

Anthony
 

Attachments

  • spring constant.png
    spring constant.png
    561 bytes · Views: 762
Physics news on Phys.org
Since you are at university, why can you not look this up for yourself in a mechanics of materials text in the library?

For instance page 82 - 83 of

Singer

Strength of Materials

or

Hearn

Mechanics of Materials p299 to 301
 
I'll do that now, thank you for the book!
 
yeah! i found that post very helpful for understanding the concept, jheez, i love this stuff, i wish i could have the time in the day to learn it all, along with everything else i want to do :( anyway! thank you very much! best first post ever i think!
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top