Can ancient calendars be considered engineering or physics inventions?

AI Thread Summary
Early calendars can be viewed as both engineering and physics inventions, as they involve measuring time and facilitating agricultural practices. The development of calendars likely had a theological aspect, as predicting natural cycles would elevate an individual's status in primitive societies. Understanding the mechanics of time measurement requires physics, while the practical application of this knowledge aligns with engineering principles. The discussion raises the question of whether labeling these inventions is necessary, suggesting that their multifaceted nature may defy simple categorization. Ultimately, early calendars reflect a blend of scientific understanding and societal needs.
kaleidoscope
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
I was wondering if the early calendars developed by mankind can be considered engineering or physics inventions, as they were developed to count or measure time. Any opinions about this?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Both?
You need physics to know what you want to build, and engineering to build it.
 
I think that they were probably a theological invention, if in a primitive society you could foretell the time to plant crops, the changing cycle of tides or when animals would start to migrate than you'd be a wise man who communicated with the Gods and thus got the best of everything.
 
I agree w/ mfb. Why do you feel the need to put a lable on them?
 
Thread 'Thermo Hydrodynamic Effect'
Vídeo: The footage was filmed in real time. The rotor takes advantage of the thermal agitation of the water. The agitation is uniform, so the resultant is zero. When the aluminum cylinders containing frozen water are immersed in the water, about 30% of their surface is in contact with the water, and the rest is thermally insulated by styrofoam. This creates an imbalance in the agitation: the cold side of the water "shrinks," so that the hot side pushes the cylinders toward the cold...
Back
Top