Dispersion relation for (100) and (001)?

kaikaii
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
May I know what is the difference between the dispersion relation for 100 and 001 on the E-K diagram?

Can i say 001 has lesser dispersion? But why is it so?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
May be you could be so kind and provide us with some minimal information about what system you are talking. Electrons, photons, some specific material?
 
You can't say anything without having something specific to say it about, as DrDu says. (100) will have the same dispersion as (001) if there is a symmetry that maps the x-axis onto the z axis, like in a cubic system. In a tetragonal system there is no such symmetry so the (100) direction will be different from the (001) direction. And without more specific knowledge about the system in question there is nothing else that can be said.
 
oh yes.. you are right, I'm sorry. may i know what's the difference between the dispersion for photons and electrons? and the material is InGaAs.
 
Last edited:
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Back
Top