Asymetric graph with three nods

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tom83B
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the asymmetry of a specific graph configuration with three nodes. It questions why the graph is not considered asymmetric, noting that there appears to be only one automorphism present. The conclusion reached is that the graph cannot be asymmetric due to the existence of non-trivial symmetries, specifically the permutation (1 2). This realization clarifies the initial confusion regarding the graph's properties. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding graph symmetries in determining asymmetry.
Tom83B
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Why isn't this graph:
1-2 3
asymetric?
I think there exists only one automorphism:
2-1 3
but I'm also supposed to prove that ther are no asymetric graphs with 1<|V(G)|<=5
so it can't be assymetric
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Oh I see now! It can have no non-trivial symmetries and permutation (1 2) is already a non-trivial symmetry.
Sorry to bother
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top