Question About the Photoelectric Effect for Lower Frequencies

Linday12
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
I'm going over the photoelectric effect and have run into a conceptual problem, and was hoping for some help in resolving it. In particular, I am looking at the frequencies below the threshold frequency of whatever metal is being examined.

So, because of the lower frequency, there will be no photoelectrons. Where I am having trouble is with what happens to the energy of the photon that is still clearly interacting with the metal. The most that I could come up with is that an electron will go into an excited state, but will not have the energy to escape, and so, is pulled back.

But if that is the case, isn't it possible that another photon could interact with the electron in this excited state, giving it the needed energy to escape? But I seem to be somehow going back to the classical view, because if that was the case, then the intensity would certainly help produce photoelectrons.

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
isn't it possible that another photon could interact with the electron in this excited state, giving it the needed energy to escape?
Yes. The excited electron decays so quickly that it is very unlikely that another photon will come along in time to eject it. The function of current vs intensity, below the cutoff frequency, is very different from that classically predicted ... and there isn't supposed to be a cutoff anyway.

http://cnx.org/content/m42558/latest/?collection=col11406/latest
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Back
Top