Physics Can a PhD in experimental physics lead to a career in banking?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the transition of physicists with various PhD backgrounds into quantitative roles in the banking industry, particularly as quants. It highlights that physicists with degrees in high-energy physics, astrophysics, or experimental high-energy physics often find it easier to secure these positions due to their extensive experience in programming and data analysis. In contrast, those specializing in "soft" topics like experimental atomic physics or quantum optics may have less relevant experience, as their work often involves more hands-on experimentation and less data analysis. Consequently, they may be more inclined to pursue industrial experimental roles rather than quantitative finance. The conversation also notes that while some individuals have successfully transitioned from solid-state physics to finance, this was more common in a favorable job market for quants. Overall, a strong background in programming and data analysis is deemed crucial for a successful shift into quantitative banking roles.
Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
Hi

It is not seldom to hear about a physicist who did his/her PhD in theoretical high-energy physics/astro-physics/solid state, who then move on to a rather quantitative position in the industry, e.g. in a bank. I hear the same about people that did an experimental PhD, where statistics and programming were used extensively (experimental high-energy physics).

But what about the "soft" topics, such as experimental atomic physics, quantum optics and such. Can they also move on to a quantitative position in the banking industry, or is it more common for them to "settle" with industrial experimental work? Do people know of any statistics for this, or have any experience/opinions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you want to work in a bank take accounting and statistics classes if you want to be a physicist then take physics classes. sorry I don't have any stats for this
 
akdude1 said:
If you want to work in a bank take accounting and statistics classes if you want to be a physicist then take physics classes. sorry I don't have any stats for this

He was asking about working as a quant. It is extremely unlikely that you would be able to find a job as a quant if you study accounting, and statistics is probably not ideal either. The "traditional" background for a quant would be a PhD in physics or maths.

To answer the OP. I don't know for sure, but I am under the impression that the reason high-energy/astro PhDs can find jobs as quants is that many of them spend a LOT of time programming and analyzing data. After all, the actual experiments (observation, time at an accelerator etc) might only take up a few days per year and the rest of the time is spent sorting through vast amounts of data.

A PhD in say quantum optics, experimental solid-state etc. is very different and you would spend a lot more time doing actual experiments (and a lot of hands-on work), and you might not even have to do any advanced data analysis. Hence, you are less likely to pick up skills relevant to being a quant. I know of a few people who have moved from solid-state to finance, but that was several years ago when the job market for quants was much better than it is now.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
8K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
27
Views
2K
Back
Top