I want to find the expectation value [tex]\langle x^2 \rangle[/tex] in

broegger
Messages
257
Reaction score
0
I want to find the expectation value \langle x^2 \rangle in some problem. To do this I make a change-of-variable,

\xi = \sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{\hslash}}x,​

and compute the expectation value \langle \xi^2 \rangle like this:

\langle \xi^2 \rangle = \int\xi^2\vert\psi(\xi)\vert^2d\xi.​

Finally I change back to x:

\langle \xi^2 \rangle = \langle \frac{m\omega}{\hslash}x^2 \rangle = \frac{m\omega}{\hslash}\langle x^2 \rangle \Rightarrow \langle x^2 \rangle = \frac{\hslash}{m\omega}\langle \xi^2 \rangle.​

I really can't see what is wrong here, but something is! I've tried it 10 times and I keep getting the wrong result.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
broegger said:
\langle \xi^2 \rangle = \int\xi^2\vert\psi(\xi)\vert^2d\xi.​

Be carefull that your psi is still correctly normalized when expressed in xi !

cheers,
Patrick.
 
Yep, that's it :D

Thank you very much! How do you spot these things right away?
 
broegger said:
Yep, that's it :D

Thank you very much! How do you spot these things right away?

Because I'm an expert :blushing:

An expert is someone who has made all possible and imaginable errors in a very small domain :smile:

cheers,
Patrick.
 
I see I'm on the right track, then... :smile:
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
575
Replies
2
Views
995
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top