Detect planets through mag field?

  • Thread starter Thread starter japam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Planets
AI Thread Summary
Detecting exoplanets through their magnetic fields is considered plausible, as these fields extend significantly beyond the planet itself, potentially making them easier to identify with radio telescopes. However, not all exoplanets possess substantial magnetic fields; a liquid core is typically necessary for detection. There is speculation that indirect methods could be employed, such as observing disturbances in the electromagnetic field of the central star when planets are present compared to stars without planets. The discussion raises questions about whether astronomers have already explored these methods. Overall, the feasibility of using magnetic fields for exoplanet detection remains an intriguing area of research.
japam
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Is plausible to use the magnetic field of an exoplanet to detect it?
Since the field extends much more over space than the body planet it could be much more easy to detect with a radiotelescope
i ever wondered if astronomers have not tried it already
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Not all the planets have significant magnetic fiels... the planet must have a liquid core to be possible the detection...
 
or maybe can be detected indirectly , looking at disturbances in the central star's electromagnetic field ,compared with a no-planets star?
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Today at about 4:30 am I saw the conjunction of Venus and Jupiter, where they were about the width of the full moon, or one half degree apart. Did anyone else see it? Edit: The moon is 2,200 miles in diameter and at a distance of 240,000 miles. Thereby it subtends an angle in radians of 2,200/240,000=.01 (approximately). With pi radians being 180 degrees, one radian is 57.3 degrees, so that .01 radians is about .50 degrees (angle subtended by the moon). (.57 to be more exact, but with...
Back
Top