Gravity and Time: A Revolutionary Thought

  • Thread starter Thread starter cytokinesis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Time
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the relationship between gravity and time, proposing that gravity may be a constant acceleration in the fourth dimension, which is time. Participants debate whether time could be perceived as the force behind gravity, suggesting that the curvature of time in a gravitational field affects an object's progress through time. It is noted that while gravity deflects an object’s inertia, this deflection results in the sensation of acceleration we associate with gravity. The conversation highlights the complexity of understanding space-time and its dimensions, emphasizing that the fourth dimension is not merely time but a broader concept involving spatial dimensions as well. Overall, the thread delves into the intricate connections between gravity, time, and the fabric of the universe.
cytokinesis
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
I'm either restating a well known property of general relativity, or really on to something, but I had a thought that if gravity is a constant acceleration in the 4th dimension, and time is considered to be the 4th dimension, could time in some way be considered the push that we believe to be gravity? or am I way off my rocker?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Originally posted by cytokinesis
I'm either restating a well known property of general relativity, or really on to something, but I had a thought that if gravity is a constant acceleration in the 4th dimension, and time is considered to be the 4th dimension, could time in some way be considered the push that we believe to be gravity? or am I way off my rocker?

www.geocities.com/dr_physica/tip.htm

by the way:
space-time concept for me is nothing else but velocity concept cause space and time only preset velocity.Why would velocity be so important?
 
that had nothing to do with my original question. Is it possible that time and the acceleration we experience as gravity are one and the same?
 
As far as I understand (not saying much) the 4dim is not time. In our 3d world we use time as a fourth dimension only to identify points in space-time. The 4d universe that I was talking about is the 3 spatial dims we know and another dim perpendicular to those. Spacial 4d and 4d time-space is a completely different thing. I think.
 
It makes sense to me that if space-time is considered to be 4d and our 'space' consists of the first 3, then the remainder, the time value, is the 4th.
 
I was just about to post that same thing over in the thread entitled, "Can You Explain How Space-Time and Gravity Works"(or something like that). If I understand my GR correctly, then you are absolutely right; the fourth dimension that's being "curved" by gravity is, in fact, time. So as you enter a gravitational field, your progress through time gets curved but, if you are standing on the surface of a planet, the planet gets in the way, continuously deflecting you off of the curved path your inertia tries to take. This continual deflection results in the acceleration felt as gravity. At least, that's how I understand it.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?

Similar threads

Back
Top