Ballistic Pendulum Lab: Solving for Cart Speed

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics lab involving a ballistic pendulum that strikes a cart, with the goal of determining the cart's speed based on the pendulum's height. The initial approach suggests using gravitational potential energy converted to kinetic energy to find the pendulum's speed at the bottom of its swing. However, concerns arise about the appropriateness of using the elastic collision formula, as some participants argue that momentum conservation should be prioritized in this scenario. It is emphasized that the system is isolated, and the pendulum's post-collision behavior must be measured to accurately calculate momentum. The conversation highlights the need for careful consideration of the collision type and the experimental setup.
fomenkoa
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Hi all

We are doing a physics lab where we lift a pendulum to a certain height, let go of it, and the pendulum strikes a physics cart on a track. A lightgate then measures the velocity of the cart.

We need to figure out the speed of the cart given the distance the pendulum is raised by

I think you do it like this:
At the top, the pendulum's energy is all mgh
at the bottom of the swing, the pendulum's energy is all kinetic, so it is now all 0.5 m v^2 from this, we can figure out its speed at the bottom

The pendulum's mass and speed at the bottom of swing is now known. The cart's mass is known and it starts from rest.

Then you just plug values into the formula for elastic collisions:

(2 * m1 / (m1+m2) )* speed of pendulum at bottom) = speed of cart




Is this correct? It seems too simple since the lab is supposed to be harder than this. Can one actually use the elastic collision formula?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, please read https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=846832#post846832" thread so to better format your equation.

Anytime I see the expression (m1 + m2) in an expression about a collision I think inelastic. Could you please show us the derivation of your final velocity expression?

EDIT: Did your experimental numbers agree with your expression?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I would guess that one would rather use conservation of momentum. You have an isolated system assuming that the pendulum hits the cart on the same height as its center of mass and the cart has negligible friction. Therefore momentum will be conserved. The pendulum will probably swing back upwards after the collision. You need to measure the amount by which it swung upwards in order to calculate the momentum of the pendulum after the collision.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top