The Rise of Slime: Marine Evolution in Reverse

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the alarming trend of advanced marine life struggling to survive while primitive forms, such as algae and bacteria, thrive in various ecosystems, including the Pacific atolls and Eastern Seaboard shrimp beds. Marine ecologist Jeremy B.C. Jackson highlights this phenomenon as a regression in evolution, coining it "the rise of slime." The article emphasizes that human interference, particularly through nutrient enrichment, disrupts ecological succession, leading to less species diversity and a dominance of fast-reproducing organisms like algae. This situation is characterized by a high energy flow and the destruction of natural homeostasis, resulting in a decline of species with lower reproductive rates. The discussion also critiques Jackson's terminology, suggesting that the correct framing is "succession running in reverse," rather than evolution itself. References to classic ecological theories by Ramon Margalef and Eugene Odum are recommended for further understanding of these dynamics.
marcus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
24,753
Reaction score
794
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-ocean30jul30,0,7764272.story?page=1


"...In many places — the atolls of the Pacific, the shrimp beds of the Eastern Seaboard, the fiords of Norway — some of the most advanced forms of ocean life are struggling to survive while the most primitive are thriving and spreading. Fish, corals and marine mammals are dying while algae, bacteria and jellyfish are growing unchecked. Where this pattern is most pronounced, scientists evoke a scenario of evolution running in reverse, returning to the primeval seas of hundreds of millions of years ago.

Jeremy B.C. Jackson, a marine ecologist and paleontologist at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in La Jolla, says we are witnessing "the rise of slime."..."
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Lyngbya Majuscula grows in long dark filaments. It is a strain of cyanobacteria. Very primitive. harks back to before multicell life.

would like to get some comment on this article from bio people
 
marcus said:
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-ocean30jul30,0,7764272.story?page=1"...In many places — the atolls of the Pacific, the shrimp beds of the Eastern Seaboard, the fiords of Norway — some of the most advanced forms of ocean life are struggling to survive while the most primitive are thriving and spreading. Fish, corals and marine mammals are dying while algae, bacteria and jellyfish are growing unchecked. Where this pattern is most pronounced, scientists evoke a scenario of evolution running in reverse, returning to the primeval seas of hundreds of millions of years ago. Jeremy B.C. Jackson, a marine ecologist and paleontologist at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in La Jolla, says we are witnessing "the rise of slime."..."
Nothing new under the sun of ecology theory--what we have here is the classic interference of humans on ecology succession--nutrient enriched ecosystems are kept in a state of low maturity (e.g., less species diversity) with high rate of energy flow and destruction of homeostatic mechanisms. The species that suffer the most are those with a low reproductive rate, species such as algae, bacteria dominate. My only argument with J. Jackson is his use of term "evolution running in reverse"--this is not the case, cases of nutrient enrichment as discussed in this article is "succession running in reverse". If I may suggest an excellent classic work on this topic by Ramon Margalef, "Perspectives in Ecological Theory", 1968, U. of Chicago Press. Of course any of the Ecology textbooks by Eugene Odum. Both of these ecologists take a cybernetic approach to ecological theory, which should be of interest to a physicist.
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...
Back
Top