
#1
Mar2507, 10:05 AM

P: 45

What is at the center of the universe? after the Big bang?



#2
Mar2507, 10:21 AM

P: n/a

there is no centre, or you can say everything is at the centre.. Because the universe began in a single point, the whole universe and its centre where the same point, so now everything is at the centre of the universe.
This is also why no matter where in the universe you place yourself every thing seems to be moving away from you, like you were at the centre. Because of the expansion of the universe... 



#3
Mar2507, 02:58 PM

P: 15,325

The venerable balloon analogy:
Imagine a colony of ants living on the surface of a balloon that is expanding contrinuously. Which ant is nearest the centre of the ballon's surface? Every ant sees every other ant moving away from it. From its viewpoint, it is at the centre of the universe  the same as every other ant. They're ALL at the centre! 



#4
Mar2507, 06:43 PM

P: 34

What is at the center of the universe?
Hi Dave,
I believe Balloon and ant example is a poor analogy. In this analogy, ant would see only other ants moving away in two dimensional space. But in actual universe, you would see matter moving away in three dimensional. Actuall shape of the universe is always debated and clear picture is not yet available. Ant and ballon example would just confuse the readers more than helping them to visualize the shape of the universe. Hi Maxwell, No can say with 100% confidence that universe doesnt has a center. You could be right in saying that whereever you go, you would see matter moving away from you but this doesn't mean that there is no center to the universe. If there is center, at some place, you would see matter moving away in all directions with the same velocity (dependent on distance) but concentration of matter would be higher on one side. If there is no center, all the galaxies would be attracted equally by the surrounding galaxies. So there wont be any net gravitational effect on any Galaxy on a large scale (Ignoring short distance ones like Andromeda). But still most of the astronomers believe in a big crunch due to gravitational attaction provided the matter density in the universe is less than critical density and also Dark energy is said to be of overcoming gravity. So here we are clearly accepting gravity on large scales which is not possible if the universe doesn't has a center. I am not saying that there is a center to a universe but still its not clear. Thank You Talksabcd (Talks Basics) 



#5
Mar2507, 08:05 PM

P: 2,050





#6
Mar2507, 11:04 PM

P: 14





#7
Mar2507, 11:06 PM

P: 34

There is no problem in using two dimensional analogy if the same could be applied to three dimensional but this analogy utterly fails when comes to three dimensional to prove that there is no center.
Please see my second paragraph in post #4 



#8
Mar2507, 11:15 PM

Sci Advisor
P: 1,253

It all boils down to initial conditions. The Big Bang caused everything to begin moving apart and hence they continue to do so. It is a common misconception that the Big Bang happened at a point. This is not the case. It happened everywhere. There is no one point you can trace all the matter in the universe back to if you run time backwards. By the way, the Big Crunch is not thought by anyone to be a reasonable prediction of the universes future. It is not supported by the observations at present. Even if it was, it dosn't require a center of the Universe to exist in order to occur. A Big Crunch is NOT where all the material in the Universe moves to a single point. What it is is that density of the universe goes to infinity, but there can still be an infinite (or indeed finite) distance between points in the infinitely dense universe. 



#9
Mar2507, 11:24 PM

P: 45

Also, Isn't ther violation of conservation of mass during Big bang? 



#10
Mar2507, 11:50 PM

Sci Advisor
P: 1,253

The post you quote was almost correct although it also made the common mistake of thinking the Big Bang occurred at a single point. The universe is homogeneous (on large enough scales) and hence is doing the same dance at all places at any one time. So if the universe is expanding then the whole universe is doing so, if the universe is accelerating or decelerating then again it does so at all places at the same time. There is no inner or outer shell. There is no violation of mass conservation in the Big Bang since conservation laws describe the constancy of something with time. Since time begins with the Big Bang there is nothing to compare with previously! Mass is conserved as the universe expands since the density decreases. If the universe doubles in volume then the density of mass halves. 



#11
Mar2607, 12:21 AM

P: 34

I wouldn't argue with general theory of relativity. Here you are considering universe as infinite. So many things are possible under infinite universe. If the universe is infinite, no one would dare to say that there is a center to the universe. But how can anyone be so sure that universe is infinite ? and not finite ?. Is there any sound practical evidence that universe is infinite ? Infinite universe would also mean infinite energy which is beyond my grasp. Please explain. You are saying that Big Bang happened everywhere. How can this be ? Can you give brief explanation or direct me to some link ? I never heard of this.. You are saying that under big crunch, density of the universe goes to infinity. We know that there is nothing higher than infinity. How one can measure distances in an infinitely dense universe ? Please explain. Infinite density means zero volume. How can one measure distances in zero volume ? Are you talking about extra dimensions ? 



#12
Mar2607, 12:41 AM

Sci Advisor
P: 1,253





#13
Mar2607, 01:41 AM

Sci Advisor
P: 1,253

There is nothing that we have observed that suggests the Earth is the center of the Universe. There is no theory that requires this to be true to explain something else. If you have any evidence for this not being the case please share it with us all!
[sorry Wallace  I'm trying to clean this up... Russ] 



#14
Mar2607, 05:08 AM

P: 183

Whats at the center, well, first answer whether universe in restricted to some expanse or not ? The point of bigbang needn't be the center (how do we know if the explosion was symmetrical in all dimensions)
PS: Sorry if this sounds unconvincing,i am a novice in this field. I am just sharing my views. 



#15
Mar2607, 07:00 AM

Mentor
P: 22,000





#16
Mar2607, 07:08 AM

Mentor
P: 22,000





#17
Mar2607, 10:05 AM

P: 34

I can easily visualize two dimensional finite space with no center using ant and balloon analogy but it helped me nothing in visualizing a three dimensional finite space with no center. 



#18
Mar2607, 10:18 AM

Mentor
P: 22,000

Visualizing it isn't really possible because our eyes (and thus our brains) are limited to seeing in 3 dimensions, but in 1 dimension (the edge of a circle), the perimeter has no center, but finite length and is curved in a second dimension. In two dimensions (the surface of a sphere), the surface has no center, but a finite area and is curved over a third dimension. In three dimensions, then, the space would have no center but finite volume and there must be a curvature in higher dimensions. The three concepts are the same.
You can't visualize why/how, but if you fly far enough in one direction, you'll end up back where you started, just like if you were flying around the earth. 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Center of the Universe  Special & General Relativity  7  
The Center of the Universe  Cosmology  55  
Center of the Universe?  General Astronomy  10  
The center of the universe?  General Astronomy  3 