Mixed Quantum States: Definition, Uses & Homework

Tac-Tics
Messages
816
Reaction score
7
I have a book on quantum computation that explains the concept of a mixed quantum state. The definition is pretty plain, you just have a boring probability distribution over a set of quantum states.

What I would like to know is why we need mixed states. How are they represented physically in nature. What kind of leverage do they give us over pure states in describing an experiment? What kinds of homework problems would you expect to solve using them ;-)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tac-Tics said:
I have a book on quantum computation that explains the concept of a mixed quantum state. The definition is pretty plain, you just have a boring probability distribution over a set of quantum states.

What I would like to know is why we need mixed states. How are they represented physically in nature. What kind of leverage do they give us over pure states in describing an experiment? What kinds of homework problems would you expect to solve using them ;-)

Mixed states are standard statistical ensembles of "pure" quantum states, and they appear whenever we don't have complete information of the quantum state, pretty much in the same way as in classical physics. For instance, if you have a beam of "unpolarized" light, then you represent this as a mixed state of "up" and "down" spins for the photons. This is entirely different from a superposition of "up" and "down", which would result in just another polarization state, and which would show "interference" effects.

Now, there can be a funny interplay between the statistical properties of mixed states, and the statistical properties of the measurement results of a pure quantum state.

In a way, you can see a mixed state as "a superposition without interference effects". In fact, quantum mechanics manifests itself as the possibility to come up with different results than that of a mixed state, in a true superposition (a pure state).
Decoherence is the phenomenon of turning superpositions in mixed states.
 
vanesch said:
In a way, you can see a mixed state as "a superposition without interference effects". In fact, quantum mechanics manifests itself as the possibility to come up with different results than that of a mixed state, in a true superposition (a pure state).
Decoherence is the phenomenon of turning superpositions in mixed states.

How would you go about preparing a particle in a mixed state?
 
Tac-Tics said:
How would you go about preparing a particle in a mixed state?

The same way you prepare a dice to be in a mixed state :smile:

Seriously, a mixed state is an ensemble description. In fact, one of the peculiar things about the interplay between mixed state statistics and quantum statistics is that considering particles in a "mixed state" is indistinguishable from considering them in a randomly drawn pure state if that random drawing gives a statistically equivalent description as the mixed state. Worse, there are *different* ensembles of *different* pure states which are all observationally indistinguishable from the "mixed state". What describes a mixed state, or all of these ensembles, is the density matrix rho.

Simple example:
the mixed state "unpolarized electron".

You can see it as 50% |x+> and 50% |x-> (an ensemble of pure states)
or you can see it as 50% |z+> and 50% |z-> (another ensemble of pure states)
or you can see it as 25% |x+>, 25%|x->, 25%|z+> and 25% |z-> (yet another ensemble of pure states)
etc...

they are all observationally indistinguishable. They are all described by one and the same density matrix rho:
1/2 0
0 1/2
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I am not sure if this falls under classical physics or quantum physics or somewhere else (so feel free to put it in the right section), but is there any micro state of the universe one can think of which if evolved under the current laws of nature, inevitably results in outcomes such as a table levitating? That example is just a random one I decided to choose but I'm really asking about any event that would seem like a "miracle" to the ordinary person (i.e. any event that doesn't seem to...
Back
Top