Newton's Law of Motion for a Straight Line Motion

!!!
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An oil tanker's engines have broken down, and the wind is blowing the tanker straight toward a reef at a constant speed of 1.5 m/s. When the tanker is 500 m from the reef, the wind dies down just as the engineer gets the engines going again. The rudder is stuck, so the only choice is to try to accelerate straight backward away from the reef. The mass of the tanker and cargo is 3.6 x 107 kg, and the engines produce a net horizontal force of 8.0 x 104N on the tanker. Will the ship hit the reef? If it does, will the oil be safe? The hull can withstand an impact at a speed of 0.2 m/s or less. You can ignore the retarding force of the water on the tanker's hull.


Homework Equations


F = ma
vx = v0x + axt
x = x0 + v0xt + 1/2 axt2
vx2= v0x2 + 2ax(x-x0)
x - x0 = (v0x + vx / 2)t

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't exactly know what to do first, so I first found the acceleration of the ship's engines.
a = f/m = 8.0 x 104N / 3.6 x 107 kg = 2.22 x 103 m/s2

Then I tried to find the time it takes for the ship to hit the reef:
vx = v0x + axt
1.5 = 0 + (2.22 x 103)(t)
t = 6.757 x 10-4 s.

And plugged it into the distance traveled:
x = x0 + v0xt + 1/2 axt2
x = 0 + 0 + 1/2 (2.22 x 103)(6.757 x 10-4)2
x = 5.02 x 10-4 m.

The book's answer said that it's 506 m so the ship will hit the reef, and the speed at which the ship hits the reef is 0.17 m/s, so the oil should be safe.
But I don't know how to get to the correct answers. :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
! said:

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't exactly know what to do first, so I first found the acceleration of the ship's engines.
a = f/m = 8.0 x 104N / 3.6 x 107 kg = 2.22 x 103 m/s2
Is it reasonable that the ship will receive an acceleration of 2220 m/s2? No, it's certainly not. Check your calculation in this step.
 
! said:
a = f/m = 8.0 x 104N / 3.6 x 107 kg = 2.22 x 103 m/s2

shouldn't it be:
a = f/m = 8.0 x 104N / 3.6 x 107 kg = 2.22 x 10-3 m/s2
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top