Cosmic microwave background radiation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the cosmic microwave background radiation and the advancements made by the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP), which provides high-resolution measurements of this radiation. WMAP improves upon previous surveys like the Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) by offering finer detail and the ability to measure radiation polarization. The article discusses significant cosmological findings from WMAP, including the universe's age and matter content. Additionally, there is a query about detecting fundamental constituents of the universe, such as strings in string theory, and whether geometry can be observed beyond electromagnetic radiation. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of WMAP in understanding the universe's structure and origins.
BryceG
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
i read a article and i can't really understand all of it. I get some but then its beyond me.
If someone could briefly summarise it so i can understand.

Here is the link.

http://www.aip.org/enews/physnews/2003/split/624-1.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
This article describes a survery of the cosmic microwave background radiation made by a satellite called the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP). Basically, it uses two radio telescopes to measures the energy of the radiation coming from every direction in space. The energy of the radiation can be described with a "characteristic" temperature.

WMAP is not the first such survey. The last one, done by the COsmic Background Explorer (COBE) satellite, had much lower resolution -- it could not discern details as fine as WMAP did. In addition, WMAP can also measure the polarization of the radiation, which is essentially the plane of the varying electric field of the radiation photons.

The page goes on to describe some of the first numerical cosmological results from WMAP, including the age of the universe and its matter content.

Please ask me some specific questions if you have any.

- Warren
 
all our investigationtions of the universe involve EM detection in one
way or another, but in theoreis of gravity the geometry or string holds
as the basic, "thing" of the universe can these things be detected?
 
I'm not sure I understand wolfram's question ... is it "can the fundamental constituents of the universe - strings* - be detected?" Or maybe, "can the geometry** of the universe be detected, other than by observations of electro-magnetic radiation?"

*in the sense of what's in String Theory/M Theory.

**in the sense of General Relativity.
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top