Changing string length -> changing fundamental freq.

AI Thread Summary
A 0.5 m violin string has a fundamental frequency of 440 Hz, and the discussion revolves around calculating the new length required for a fundamental frequency of 528 Hz. The calculated length for the new frequency is 0.416 m, which aligns with the principle that a shorter string produces a higher frequency. The participant questions how the wave velocity remains at 440 m/s despite shortening the string, suggesting that tension or linear density might change. It is clarified that if the tension remains the same as in the longer string, the wave velocity will also remain unchanged. The discussion emphasizes the relationship between string length, frequency, and wave velocity in a fixed tension scenario.
Lavabug
Messages
858
Reaction score
37

Homework Statement


Don't have the solution, just want to check if I did this properly.

A 0.5 m violin string fixed at both ends has its first harmonic or fundamental frequency at 440 Hz. Assuming the string is non dispersive, calculate the length it should have so its new fundamental frequency will be 528 Hz.


Homework Equations


The nth harmonic's wavelength is 2L/n, where L is the length of the string.
\lambda\upsilon = v

The Attempt at a Solution


Apparently the phase velocity of the given fundamental harmonic is 440m/s.

If I want a new \upsilon of 528 Hz, I'd need a string of length = v/2\upsilon, so 440/2(528) = 0.416m. A shorter string = higher frequency which makes sense, but my question is: how is the velocity of the wave still 440 m/s? I just shortened the string, wouldn't the tension be greater necessarily(or the linear density decreased as a consequence), hence the velocity would change?

For the sake of simplicity: does the new fundamental harmonic at 528Hz still propagate at 440m/s along the string?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lavabug said:
A shorter string = higher frequency which makes sense, but my question is: how is the velocity of the wave still 440 m/s? I just shortened the string, wouldn't the tension be greater necessarily(or the linear density decreased as a consequence), hence the velocity would change?

You can choose the tension in the shorter string the same as in the longer one. (It is not stretched to the original length). So the linear density stays the same.




ehild
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top