New Reply

Japan Earthquake: nuclear plants

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Aug6-11, 05:28 AM   #10813
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member

Japan Earthquake: nuclear plants


Quote by joewein View Post
The vertical brown-stained pipe is probably connected to one of the two smaller pipes that run along the fat pipe from the Y-section leading to units 1 and 2. There's one at each side of the fat pipe.
The brown-stained section of the pipe is the last final bit of pipe before entry into the stack, this last bit is shared by the exhausts from unit 1 and 2 EGTS (Emergency Gas Treatment Systems).

Right above the stained part you see the forking out of one pipe up and towards south, that pipe is connected via a 90 deg bend to the smaller pipe along the fat pipe, coming from unit 2. The other fork proceeds vertically for a bit, then makes an upwards bend towards the north, and then a 90 deg bend to become aligned and connected with the smaller pipe coming from unit 1. I think you can make out the arrangement from the attached photo that is shot from the south-west.

Ian Goddard speculates on his site that the brownish colour is not rust but cesium. However, for that the pipe would have to be leaky, for you to see cesium condensate on the outside, not just the inside.
Cesium compounds are generally colorless, so taking the color brown as an indicator color for the presence of cesium appears like madness. Quite on the contrary. if a cesium mineral is found to be brownish a geologist will reasonably suspect the color is due to the presence of impurities, e.g. Fe3+ impurities aka 'rust'.
Attached Thumbnails
unit1-2_egts-exhaust.jpg  
 
Aug6-11, 05:39 AM   #10814
 
The stain is indicative of some sort of leak, which evaporated, depositing the dissolved material. You can guess it would include radioactive isotopes. Also the pipe bends inside meaning some dust could have deposited there. The piping would be very radioactive even if only a small fraction of the vented material had deposited.
 
Aug6-11, 07:36 AM   #10815
 
Exactly where does the pipe come from. It's hard to follow in the Cryptome pictures. It is not the large emergency relief duct from the airspace in the reactor building. It appears to be an emergency steam relief pipe from the reactor circulation, perhaps from the condensers.

It may have flooded as a result of too much water added to the RPV. It is possible that the bottom of the stack is filled with water. I notice the most severe corrosion is at the join between the pipe and the stack. There is thick brown layer of rust on the shield below it.
Attached Thumbnails
10svha.jpg  
 
Aug6-11, 08:29 AM   #10816
 
Quote by AtomicWombat View Post
Exactly where does the pipe come from. It's hard to follow in the Cryptome pictures. It is not the large emergency relief duct from the airspace in the reactor building. It appears to be an emergency steam relief pipe from the reactor circulation, perhaps from the condensers.
It comes from a filter room on the second floor, where also extremely high values were measured.

Attached are cropped images from a Cryptome set.
Attached Thumbnails
aerial-2011-3-30-0-50-45.png   japan-earthquake-2011-3-30-0-50-12.png   aerial-2011-3-30-1-10-7.jpg  
 
Aug6-11, 10:52 AM   #10817
 
Blog Entries: 1
So after something goes very wrong you vent the reactor directly into the atmosphere? What the .. ?
 
Aug6-11, 12:39 PM   #10818

Engineering 2012
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Quote by robinson View Post
So after something goes very wrong you vent the reactor directly into the atmosphere? What the .. ?
better a controlled vent through filters than waiting for it to vent itself.
Think of the engine coolant reservoir in your automobile - keeps ethylene glycol off the pavement, within its design limits.

recall the operators were VERY hesitant to use it - the top brass had to directly order it.

old jim
 
Aug6-11, 01:02 PM   #10819
 
Blog Entries: 1
Why not vent it into a giant reservoir of water? So the steam condenses, and it doesn't go wafting down wind?
 
Aug6-11, 04:07 PM   #10820
 
Quote by vanesch View Post
I have to say I don't understand how you can have a hydrogen explosion blowing apart the confinement building, and not the reactor vessel.

I also don't understand how you can let any pressure build up in the confinement building at the risk of rupture if it is slowly. One should prefer steam releases (even contaminated) in order to ensure the integrity of the confinement building if ever the reactor vessel breaks, no ? Now we are not very far from a full release of the core in the environment.
First point is easy ,the reactor vessels and secondary confinement are distinct and separate.

If hydrogen collects in the secondary containment and is ignited ,then the seat of the detonation is identifiable ,but the product is less predictable.

We have been exposed to full release of the core from the day these reactors went pop, but if you pour lots of water on the nuclear pile you can limit the geographical spread(however ,local concentration does increase)
 
Aug6-11, 04:21 PM   #10821
 
Quote by AtomicWombat View Post
Exactly where does the pipe come from. It's hard to follow in the Cryptome pictures. It is not the large emergency relief duct from the airspace in the reactor building. It appears to be an emergency steam relief pipe from the reactor circulation, perhaps from the condensers.
Here are two high-res photos of the location dated August 4, 2011, captions by TEPCO:

Stack drain pipe of exhaust stack of Units 1 and 2, Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station(from east side) (pictured on August 4,2011)

http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/news/11031...s/110805_1.jpg

Stack drain pipe of exhaust stack of Units 1 and 2, Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station(from west side) (pictured on August 4,2011)

http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/news/11031...s/110805_2.jpg

These are from TEPCO's news site updated every day or so:

http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/news/110311/
 
Aug6-11, 04:46 PM   #10822
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Quote by robinson View Post
So after something goes very wrong you vent the reactor directly into the atmosphere? What the .. ?
The stack, unless filtered, then ensures maximal dispersion of the vented materials.
That does seem a serious oversight, as a bad accident is thereby made worse.
Are there not any requirements for filtering the hardened stack emissions in case of accident?
 
Aug6-11, 05:07 PM   #10823
 
Quote by etudiant View Post
The stack, unless filtered, then ensures maximal dispersion of the vented materials.
That does seem a serious oversight, as a bad accident is thereby made worse.
Are there not any requirements for filtering the hardened stack emissions in case of accident?
In the UK it is termed "Cockcrofts folly" , it did however probably save much of NW England from a lethal dose in 1957. Discuss
 
Aug6-11, 08:52 PM   #10824
 
Blog Entries: 1
It seems impossible that the solution to a leaking reactor is to vent it directly into the atmosphere. Seriously?
 
Aug6-11, 10:51 PM   #10825
 
Quote by robinson View Post
It seems impossible that the solution to a leaking reactor is to vent it directly into the atmosphere. Seriously?
Torus.
 
Aug7-11, 12:06 AM   #10826
 
The documents on Tepco's site:
http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/news/110311/
Refer to the the site of the high radiation as:
"Bottom of Main Exhaust Stuck of Unit 1/2 Connection of emergency gas treatment piping arrangement"
And the location of the high radiaion inside the No.1 turbine building as:
"Near the entrance of the train room for the emergency gas treatment system."
http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/nu/fukushi...10803_01-e.pdf

Does someone have a piping diagram?
It's clear to me how the pipe relates to the reactor #1 building (it skirts around the outside south & east walls), but I am still trying to work out how it relates to the reactor plumbing. Does it come from the wet well? From somewhere in the primary circulation, such as the condenser? I.e. Where does this "emergency gas treatment piping arrangement" fit into the safety systems for a BWR?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boiling...safety_systems

And what is a "train room"?
 
Aug7-11, 12:24 AM   #10827
 
Quote by AtomicWombat View Post
The documents on Tepco's site:
http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/news/110311/
And the location of the high radiaion inside the No.1 turbine building as:
"Near the entrance of the train room for the emergency gas treatment system."
http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/nu/fukushi...10803_01-e.pdf

Where does this "emergency gas treatment piping arrangement" fit into the safety systems for a BWR?
My assumption was that the "emergency gas treatment system" was the nitrogen gas feed system. If so, it is new and a result of the accident.
 
Aug7-11, 01:06 AM   #10828
 
Quote by AtomicWombat View Post
The documents on Tepco's site:
http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/news/110311/
Refer to the the site of the high radiation as:
"Bottom of Main Exhaust Stuck of Unit 1/2 Connection of emergency gas treatment piping arrangement"
And the location of the high radiaion inside the No.1 turbine building as:
"Near the entrance of the train room for the emergency gas treatment system."
http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/nu/fukushi...10803_01-e.pdf

Does someone have a piping diagram?
It's clear to me how the pipe relates to the reactor #1 building (it skirts around the outside south & east walls), but I am still trying to work out how it relates to the reactor plumbing. Does it come from the wet well? From somewhere in the primary circulation, such as the condenser?
Since the venting system is designed to protect the containment, it must release gas from the dry well and perhaps also the top of the torus. From there it would go to the filter "train", then outside the building along the fat pipe to the stack.

According to a NYT article the hardened venting system doesn't use filters, the regular venting system does.
Quote by AtomicWombat View Post
And what is a "train room"?
They were also using "train" in the sense of several connected filtering systems (like wagons on a train) when talking about the Areva water treatment system. I think the train room holds several filters trough which gas would sequentially pass before being released into the stack.
 
Aug7-11, 01:26 AM   #10829
 
Quote by Joe Neubarth View Post
Quote by robinson View Post
It seems impossible that the solution to a leaking reactor is to vent it directly into the atmosphere. Seriously?
Torus.
Yes, the torus provides some filtering, but only until until it starts boiling, which it eventually will without a working RHR.

Basically, the reactors were not designed to cope with a station blackout and consequently outage of the RHR that went on for more than a couple of hours (unit 1) or a few days (other units).
 
New Reply

Tags
japan, nuclear
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Japan Earthquake: nuclear plants
Thread Forum Replies
8.9 earthquake in Japan: tsunami warnings Current Events 671
New Nuclear Plants Nuclear Engineering 9
Gen IV Nuclear Plants Nuclear Engineering 10
New Nuclear Plants Nuclear Engineering 14
Astronomer Predicts Major Earthquake for Japan General Discussion 65