physical significance of dot and cross products in electrodynamicsby nouveau_riche Tags: cross, electrodynamics, physical, products, significance 

#1
Aug1911, 05:26 AM

P: 253

i know that del.v=divergence of vector v
and del x v=curl of vector v can anyone justify for the same? how dot product is physically connected to divergence property? 



#2
Aug1911, 05:58 AM

Mentor
P: 16,472

It is just notational convenience. The formula for divergence looks like a dot product.




#3
Aug1911, 06:24 AM

Sci Advisor
Thanks
P: 2,132

If you have an Euclidean space (e.g., [itex]\mathbb{R}^3[/itex] that describes the spatial hypersurface of an observer in an inertial frame in both Newtonian and specialrelativistic physics), the derivatives
[tex]\partial_i=\frac{\partial}{\partial x^i}[/tex] act formaly like components of a covector (covariant components). It's convenient to write this in vector notation as the nabla symbol [itex]\vec{\nabla}[/itex]. In Cartesian coordinates you can now easily play with that symbol to create new tensor fields out of given tensors by operating on their corresponding components wrt. to the Cartesian basis (and cobasis). The most important examples, all appearing in electromagnetism as well as fluid dynamics are The Gradient The gradient of a scalar field is a vector field (more precisely a oneform) and defined by [tex]\mathrm{grad} f=\vec{\nabla} f=\vec{e}^j \partial_j f.[/tex] The Divergence The divergence of a vector field is a scalar field defined by [tex]\mathrm{div} \vec{V}=\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{V}=\partial_i V^i.[/tex] The Curl The curl of a vector field is given by [tex]\mathrm{curl} \vec{V}=\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{V}.[/tex] The structure of this becomes more clear by looking at it in terms of alternating differential forms (Cartan calculus). Given a 1form (covector) [itex]\omega = \mathrm{d}x^j \omega_j[/itex], you get an alternating 2form by [tex]\mathrm{d} \omega = \mathrm{d} x^j \wedge \mathrm{d} x^k \partial_j \omega_k = \frac{1}{2} \mathrm{d} x^j \wedge \mathrm{d} x^k (\partial_j \omega_k\partial_k \omega_j).[/tex] In more conventional terms, you have a antisymmetric rank2 tensor, given by its covariant components [itex]\partial_j \omega_k\partial_k \omega_j[/itex]. In 3 dimensions, you can map this uniquely to a vector field by hodge dualization: [tex][\mathrm{curl} \vec{V}]^j=\epsilon^{jkl} (\partial_k V_l\partial_j V_k).[/tex] Further, since in Euclidean spaced the metric has components [tex]\delta_{jk}[/tex] wrt. Cartesian Coordinates, you have [tex]V^j=V_j[/tex]. 



#4
Aug1911, 11:00 AM

P: 253

physical significance of dot and cross products in electrodynamics 



#5
Aug1911, 11:23 AM

Mentor
P: 16,472

Recall
[tex](a,b,c)\cdot(d,e,f) = ad+be+cf[/tex] [tex]\text{Divergence}(f)=\frac{\partial}{\partial x}f_x+\frac{\partial}{\partial y}f_y+\frac{\partial}{\partial z}f_z=\left( \frac{\partial}{\partial x}, \frac{\partial}{\partial y}, \frac{\partial}{\partial z} \right) \cdot \left( f_x, f_y, f_z \right) = \nabla \cdot f[/tex] 



#6
Aug2011, 06:39 AM

P: 253





#7
Aug2011, 05:33 PM

P: 7

[tex]\nabla.\phi = \frac{\partial \phi_x}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial \phi_y}{\partial y}+\frac{\partial \phi_z}{\partial z}[/tex]
It looks like the dot product of [tex]\frac{\partial}{\partial x} +\frac{\partial}{\partial y} + \frac{\partial}{\partial z}[/tex] and [tex](\phi_x,\phi_y,\phi_z)[/tex]. It's an abuse of notation. 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
physical significance  Introductory Physics Homework  9  
what is physical significance of g factor?  Quantum Physics  35  
Physical significance behind [H, rho]=0  Quantum Physics  5  
Questions concerning cross products, dot products, and polar coordinates  Introductory Physics Homework  1  
Physical Significance of Numbers  General Physics  4 