Solving Force Combinations: 6N + 8N = 14N, 2N, 10N

  • Thread starter Thread starter Crusaderking1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on combining forces of 6 N and 8 N to achieve resultant forces of 14 N, 2 N, and 10 N. Participants clarify that when forces are aligned in the same direction, their magnitudes simply add, while if they oppose each other, the resultant is the difference. For non-collinear vectors, the resultant can be determined using the parallelogram rule or by resolving vectors into components. A participant realizes that a 90-degree angle between the two forces can yield a resultant of 10 N through the Pythagorean theorem. Overall, the conversation emphasizes understanding graphical vector addition and the methods to calculate resultant forces effectively.
Crusaderking1
Messages
158
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



3. Draw figures showing how you would combine a 6 N force and an 8 N force to obtain a resultant force with magnitude (a) 14 N; (b) 2 N; (c) 10 N.

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



I just don't know where to start or what equation to use.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you understand how to calculate a vector sum graphically? That's all this question is really about...
 
cepheid said:
Do you understand how to calculate a vector sum graphically? That's all this question is really about...

In our lab we graphed forces, but they had an angle as well.
 
Oh wait, like draw a straight line with 8 and 6 for 14, while drawing lines with arrows towards each other for 2?

14
-------------->------------------------->2
--------------><-------------------------
 
Crusaderking1 said:
Oh wait, like draw a straight line with 8 and 6 for 14, while drawing lines with arrows towards each other for 2?

Well, you've found two combinations that work. If the forces are in the same direction, the magnitude of the resultant is just the sum of the magnitudes of the two vectors. Likewise if they're in the exact opposite direction, the magnitude of the resultant is just the difference of their magnitudes. But the more general case is when they are not co-linear, meaning along the same line. I.e. the angle between them is something other than 0 or 180 degrees. How do you find the resultant in this case? In other words, how do vectors sum together? You should know this.
 
cepheid said:
Well, you've found two combinations that work. If the forces are in the same direction, the magnitude of the resultant is just the sum of the magnitudes of the two vectors. Likewise if they're in the exact opposite direction, the magnitude of the resultant is just the difference of their magnitudes. But the more general case is when they are not co-linear, meaning along the same line. I.e. the angle between them is something other than 0 or 180 degrees. How do you find the resultant in this case? In other words, how do vectors sum together? You should know this.

Well, I can add vectors(of force) by finding components, graphing them, or using a force table.

I don't really know how to add vectors that well, but wouldn't there be a 90 degree angle between 6 and 8 to give me 10, since 8^2+6^2 square root= 10.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Crusaderking1 said:
Well, I can add vectors(of force) by finding components, graphing them, or using a force table.

I don't really know how to add vectors that well, but wouldn't there be a 90 degree angle between 6 and 8 to give me 10, since 8^2+6^2 square root= 10.

Yeah. So you figured out the answer to all three cases by trial and error or "guess and check." But the general method for finding the resultant is either to resolve each vector into components and add them component-wise, or to do it graphically by using the "parallelogram rule" for vector sums (which I can only assume you must have learned):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclidean_vector#Addition_and_subtraction
 
cepheid said:
Yeah. So you figured out the answer to all three cases by trial and error or "guess and check." But the general method for finding the resultant is either to resolve each vector into components and add them component-wise, or to do it graphically by using the "parallelogram rule" for vector sums (which I can only assume you must have learned):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclidean_vector#Addition_and_subtraction

Thanks a lot.

I definitely understand what I'm suppose to do much better.
 
Back
Top