| New Reply |
Typo error or correct wavefunction? |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Nov15-11, 10:01 PM | #1 |
|
|
Typo error or correct wavefunction?
Hi!
I would like to ask everyone's opinion about this wavefunction in the momentum representation: ψ(p) = N[θ(-p)exp(ap/hbar) + θ(p)exp(-ap/hbar)], where N is a normalization constant, a > 0, and θ(p) is a function defined as θ(p) = 0 for p > 0 and also θ(p) = 0 for p < 0. I think the θ function has been written incorrectly, right? It is just zero all over the momentum space. What I did is I assume it to be a step function, replacing θ(p) = 0 for p > 0 with θ(p) = 1 for p > 0. Now, when calculating for the probability density of finding the particle at x, I used Fourier transform to do it. But to my surprise, the exponential terms were cancelled and I am left with only dx in the integration. What do you think did I miss? Thanks everyone and I am hoping for your suggestions! |
| Nov15-11, 10:16 PM | #2 |
|
Recognitions:
|
[tex]\Psi(p) \propto \exp(-a|p|/\hbar)[/tex] |
| Nov15-11, 10:31 PM | #3 |
|
|
|
| Nov16-11, 03:33 AM | #4 |
|
Recognitions:
|
Typo error or correct wavefunction?
To go from the momentum representation to the position representation you have to take the Fourier transform of the wave function, not the probability:
[tex]\psi(t,x)=\langle x|\psi \rangle=\int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} p \langle x|p \rangle \langle p | \psi \rangle.[/tex] Now you have (setting [itex]\hbar=1[/itex]) [tex]\langle x | p \rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} \exp(\mathrm{i} p x).[/tex] That means [tex]\psi(t,x)=\int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} p \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} \exp(\mathrm{i} p x) \tilde{\psi}(t,p).[/tex] In your case it's a quite simple integral. You just have to split the integration in the ranges [itex]p<0[/itex] and [itex]p>0[/itex] and just calculate the integral. |
| Nov17-11, 06:39 AM | #5 |
|
|
Thanks for the detailed note. I did it but it turns out that the total integral vanish! What does it implies when the position representation is zero? I am expecting to get a Gaussian like solution. Or do you think I need to use Dirac delta function here instead of the exp(ipx/hbar) term? |
| Nov18-11, 10:38 AM | #6 |
|
Recognitions:
|
That integral does not vanish.
|
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Typo error or correct wavefunction?
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| How to correct for random measurement error? | Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics | 3 | ||
| infinite potential well wavefunction contribution to 'classical' initial wavefunction | Advanced Physics Homework | 1 | ||
| quaternions angle error - correct? | General Math | 7 | ||
| Electromagnetic Wave Prob. (Is this a typo/error??) | Introductory Physics Homework | 3 | ||
| Typo?? | Introductory Physics Homework | 2 | ||