Unit vectors and vector quantities (notation)

AI Thread Summary
When writing vector quantities with unit vectors, it is necessary to indicate that they are vectors, either through bolding or using arrow notation. The magnitude of a vector is a scalar and does not require such notation. Different notations, like tildes and arrows, are largely interchangeable, with no inherent difference unless specified. International standards suggest bold-face for printed vectors, while LaTeX often defaults to arrows. Ultimately, students should use the notation they will be assessed on and rely on context to understand vector representations.
autodidude
Messages
332
Reaction score
0
When you write vector quantities with unit vectors, do you still have to draw an arrow on top to indicate that it's a vector? e.g. velocity and acceleration. My textbook doesn't have it bolded so does that mean they're just taking the magnitude and then multiplying by the unit vector to make it a vector?

Also, is there a difference between the tilde on the bottom and arrow on top notation? My math class uses tildes for all vectors. Should you use tildes or arrows with unit vectors?

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
A unit vector is just that, a vector. So it has to be labeled as such, either by bolding it or by an arrow notation. The magnitude is a scalar so it does not.
 
The different ways of writing the vector are interchangeable - so there is no difference implied in the notation unless they tell you there is one. As for which you should use:

International Standards:
ISO 31-11 describes the international standards for math notations ... the standard is bold-face and upright (i.e. not italic) for printing and an underscored tilde freehand. I know there are a lot of US folk who prefer the over-scored arrow ... ISO 31-11 has this as an alternate.

LaTeX defaults to the overscored arrow - and that one seems to be replacing ISO31-11 more and more these days. I personally find the tilde faster to write so that's what I use when I have a choice. In printed material I use LaTeX so...

It's been discussed before.

Don't sweat the changes in notation: use the one you will be assessed in.

If your text uses bold-face for vectors, then v is velocity and v is speed. A unit vector will usually be explicit as in -vj meaning speed v in the -y direction, but it may be implicit like when they say "ship A travels at speed U due north" ... see there is no bold-face but a vector has been described to you. Also notice that scalars are usually italic.

General physics students are expected to glean a lot from context - you'll get the hang of it.
 
Thank you!
 
No worries.

I had a math prof who always used lower-case Greek letters for vectors and Latin characters for scalars. It was great for saving writing. However his work didn't have to represent anything...
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top