Perpendicular distribution of EMW

AI Thread Summary
An electromagnetic wave represents a variation in the electromagnetic field, which is not easily quantified by a specific width. The concept of "variation" in the field is better understood in terms of intensity rather than physical dimensions. The discussion emphasizes that the distribution of a wave's field is complex and cannot be simplified to a measurement like "two centimeters wide." For further understanding, resources on electromagnetic waves are recommended, including animations that illustrate these concepts. Engaging with the community can help clarify any remaining questions about the physics of electromagnetic waves.
freddyfish
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
An electromagnetic wave is a variation in the electromagnetic field. How wide is the variation in the field caused by a wave? I mean, what is one wave's distribution perpendicular to the direction of the wave's progression? This distribution obviously increases in magnitude if two or more waves interfere, but the question is assuming noninterfering waves.

Thanks //Freddy
 
Physics news on Phys.org
freddyfish said:
An electromagnetic wave is a variation in the electromagnetic field. How wide is the variation in the field caused by a wave? I mean, what is one wave's distribution perpendicular to the direction of the wave's progression? This distribution obviously increases in magnitude if two or more waves interfere, but the question is assuming noninterfering waves.

Thanks //Freddy

freddyfish, welcome to Physics Forums!

You've asked a hard question. By "hard" I mean difficult to answer because the phrase "How wide is the variation..." is not so clear. Do you expect an answer such as "two centimeters wide"? This "variation" is actually a field: one is electromagnetic and one is electric, as you know. Fields are described by their intensities, and not by their "widths".
You may read up on electromagnetic waves (EMWs) at:
http://missionscience.nasa.gov/ems/02_anatomy.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_radiation
Note: at the wiki site see the animations of EMWs!

If you then have any doubts or other questions, do come back here and post them. Certainly members will help you understand the physics of EMWs. That's what we do here!
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top