Prove Triangle ABC has Angle BAC = 72 Degrees

  • Thread starter Thread starter praharmitra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Triangle
AI Thread Summary
In triangle ABC, where AD is the angle bisector of angle BAC and AB equals CD, the initial problem posed is deemed insufficient due to a lack of information. The discussion highlights that constructing a triangle under the given conditions can yield various angles, suggesting the problem's ambiguity. A participant proposes that the solution may involve geometric concepts like a pentagram or the golden ratio. Ultimately, the original question is clarified to include an additional condition: angle ABC equals twice angle BCA, prompting a renewed call for a solution. The conversation emphasizes the importance of precise information in geometric proofs.
praharmitra
Messages
308
Reaction score
1
Hey guys,

This is NOT homework. I remember solving this question many years ago (at least 10 years ago). I am trying to recall the solution again and am just not able to. The question is -

In a triangle ABC, AD is the angle bisector of angle BAC. AB = CD. Prove that angle BAC = 72 degrees.

A diagram is attached.


NOTE - I am actually not even sure the question has enough information as given. I am just recalling from memory. If you think more information is required give an appropriate reason as to why you think that is true.

Usually, the way I see if the question has enough information is that I try to construct a triangle given the above properties. If I can construct a unique triangle, then of course the information is enough. Else not.

Anyway, give it a try.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/wpvei01hw1nr25l/2012-06-06%2000.39.06.jpg
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Looks like non-sense to me. Do this: draw a right triangle, ABC, with right angle at A. At vertex C, use a protractor with radius set at length AB to mark point D on BC. D will be between B and C because the length of a leg of right triangle is always less than the length of the hypotenuse. You now have exactly the situation shown in your picture but the angle is 90 degrees, not 72. Clearly that can be done taking any acute angle at A.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Looks like non-sense to me. Do this: draw a right triangle, ABC, with right angle at A. At vertex C, use a protractor with radius set at length AB to mark point D on BC. D will be between B and C because the length of a leg of right triangle is always less than the length of the hypotenuse. You now have exactly the situation shown in your picture but the angle is 90 degrees, not 72. Clearly that can be done taking any acute angle at A.

Well, but with that construction AD will not be the angle bisector of angle A.
 
72 degrees is 1/5 of a circle, or the complementary angle of a pentagram. My guess is that the solution will involve a pentagram or star of some sort.
 
this sounds very much like golden ratio
 
Hi guys,

I figured out the problem with the question. There is not enough information to solve this problem. You can see this by doing the following construction. Draw the line AD first (This can be any length, for this argument atleast). Now draw the two equal angles BAD and DAC on either side of AD. Again, the angle could take any value. Extend the sides AB and AC such that BDC forms a straight line and BD = DC.

Now, in this triangle, AB > CD. Now rotate the side BDC around the point D such that the length of CD increases and that of AB decreases. We can always do this. Since the rotation is continuous, we will always have some angle of rotation at which AB = CD.

We then have constructed exactly the triangle described above! Since the angle is arbitrary, the question is incomplete.

I now recall what the original question was. There was an additional given -

angle ABC = 2 X angle BCA

Try and solve it now!
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
8K
Back
Top