How can I identify TRIM points in the Brillioun zone?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dipole
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Points
dipole
Messages
553
Reaction score
151
Hello, I'm trying to find a good reference for how to find or calculate or know which points in the Brillioun zone are "TRIM" (time reversal invariant momentum) points? If anyone is familiar with this topic and could perhaps post a reference or two it would be of great help.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At first look time reversal transforms k into -k. For these two points in the BZ to be equivalent, they have to be related by a reciprocal lattice vector G, e.g. -k = k + G or
k = (-)G/2. That would be pretty much all high-symmetry points on the surface of the BZ.
 
Thanks for the reply M Quack. I am under the impression that TRIM points are somehow a subset of high symmetry points, that they are "special" high symmetry points.

If it helps at all, TRIM points come up in the context of topological insulators, they are points where the wave function can change its parity I believe.
 
Thanks, that is exactly what my quick scan of Google threw up. Unfortunately none of the papers I looked at were very clear on the definition of TRIM, so I ... improvised.

You know that the BZ is limited by planes in reciprocal space half way to the next reciprocal lattice point. Therefore any point k on the line between the origin and a neighbor reciprocal lattice G point AND on the BZ boundary will fulfill k=G/2.

For some directions the BZ boundary intersects before the half way point. Therefore TRIM points are a subset of the high-symmetry points.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top