Basics of Inequalities: Solving |x-1| - |x| + |2x+3| > 2x +4

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the inequality |x-1| - |x| + |2x+3| > 2x + 4 by applying the properties of absolute values. Participants clarify the conditions for |x| > a and |x| < a, emphasizing the need to consider different cases based on the value of x. The suggested approach involves breaking the inequality into cases, such as x ≤ -2 and others, to analyze each scenario. Some cases may lead to contradictions, highlighting the complexity of the problem. Overall, the conversation aims to deepen the understanding of absolute value inequalities and their solutions.
Kartik.
Messages
55
Reaction score
1
Can we explain the meaning of the modulus(absolute value) with these equations?
|x| > a
=>x > a or x < -a(if a \in R+ and x \in R if a \in R-
|x|<a
=> -a < x < a if a \in R+ and no solution if a \in R-\cup{0}
If yes, then examples please?(for instances in x and a)
Blindly apply these equations we can solve |x-1| >= 3 as x-1<= -3 or x-1 >=3
If yes then how can we solve a inequality like |x-1| - |x| + |2x+3| > 2x +4 using the same logical statements above?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Kartik. said:
Can we explain the meaning of the modulus(absolute value) with these equations?
|x| > a
=>x > a or x < -a (if a \in R+ and x \in R if a \in R-
|x|<a
=> -a < x < a if a \in R+ and no solution if a \in R-\cup{0}
Yes, that all looks right except:
|x| > a => x > a or x < -a (if a \in R+\cup{0}) and etc.
(or, more simply, if a >= 0).
how can we solve a inequality like |x-1| - |x| + |2x+3| > 2x +4 using the same logical statements above?
Easiest way is to break it into the different cases: x <= -2, -2 <= x <= -3/2, -3/2 <= x <= 0, 0 <= x <= 1, x >= 1.
E.g.: x <= -2:
-(x-1) - (-x) + (-2x-3) > 2x + 4
Some of these will produce contradictions.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top