Time ordered product & Green's function


by johnahn
Tags: function, green, ordered, product, time
johnahn
johnahn is offline
#1
Nov7-12, 05:45 PM
P: 8
The problem is showing

(□+m^2)<0| T(∅(x)∅(y)) |0> = -δ^4 (x-y)

I know that it is relavent to Green's function, but the problem is that it should be alternatively solved without any information of Green's function, and using equal time commutation relations.

Does Anyone know that?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Physicists design quantum switches which can be activated by single photons
'Dressed' laser aimed at clouds may be key to inducing rain, lightning
Higher-order nonlinear optical processes observed using the SACLA X-ray free-electron laser
Einj
Einj is offline
#2
Nov8-12, 01:53 AM
P: 230
The point is to use the Klein Gordon operator on the T-product. Note that it is defined as [itex]T(\phi(x)\phi(y))=\theta(x^0-y^0)\phi(x)\phi(y)+\theta(y^0-x^0)\phi(y)\phi(x)[/itex] which means that when you apply the spatial derivation it passes through the thetas and acts directly on the fields. The time derivative needs a little more attention. You can perform an explicit calculation:

$$\begin{align}
\partial_0 T(\phi(x)\phi(y)) &= \theta(x^0-y^0)\dot{\phi}(x)\phi(y)+\delta(x^0-y^0)\phi(x)\phi(y)+\theta(y^0-x^0)\phi(y)\dot{\phi}(x)-\delta(x^0-y^0)\phi(y)\phi(x)\\
&=\theta(x^0-y^0)\dot{\phi}(x)\phi(y)+\theta(y^0-x^0)\phi(y)\dot{\phi}(x)
\end{align}$$

where I have used the commutation relation at equal time and the fact that the delta is the derivative of the theta.
To have the KG operator you have to perform another time derivative and thus obtain, with the same procedure:

$$\partial_0^2 T(\phi(x)\phi(y))=T(\ddot{\phi}(x)\phi(y))+\delta(x^0-y^0)[\dot{\phi}(x),\phi(y)]=T(\ddot{\phi}(x)\phi(y))-\delta^4(x-y)$$

where I have used again the commutation realtion at equal time (because of the delta).

Now, every other term in KG operator pass through the thetas and so you have:

$$(\Box+m^2)T(\phi(x)\phi(y))=T((\Box+m^2)\phi(x) \phi(y))-\delta^4(x-y)=-\delta^4(x-y)$$

because [itex]\phi[/itex] is solution of the KG equation.

I hope this was the answer you were looking for.

Einj
ehms
ehms is offline
#3
Nov12-13, 09:34 AM
P: 1
Thanks a lot Einj !


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Green's Function in Time-Dep. Schrodinger Eqn. Advanced Physics Homework 10
Definition of time-ordered product for Dirac spinors Quantum Physics 1
Green's function of Helmholtz eqn (with time) Classical Physics 5
time variant Green function Differential Equations 0
Time ordered product vs. commutator in path integral Quantum Physics 2