Need Help Understanding Angular Resolution

AI Thread Summary
A smaller angular resolution number indicates greater resolution, meaning that a resolution of 26.25" is indeed better than 2625". The formula for angular resolution involves the diameter of the aperture and the wavelength of light, where a larger diameter results in a smaller angular resolution value. The constant of 0.25" serves as a conversion factor for the units used in the calculation. The term "higher resolution" refers to the ability to distinguish finer details, similar to the concept of pixels per inch in imaging. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately interpreting angular resolution in optics.
zoiberg137
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
When calculating angular resolution, is it correct that having a SMALLER number results in GREATER angular resolution? For example, is 26.25" better resolution than 2625"?

Using the formula .25"(lambda in micrometre/diamter in meters), it would make sense to me that the larger the diameter, the smaller the answer, thus the greater the resolution. I just want to be sure I understand this correctly.

Also, out of curiosity, why are we multiplying by .25"? This is the formula my book gives me...but is this always a constant for this formula?

Thanks!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Yes, the number gets smaller with better resolution. Think of it this way - the angular resolution tells you the minimum angular separation at which two point sources could be resolved, or in other words, seen without blurring together.

In your example, an angular resolution of 26.25" means that two point sources 26 arcseconds apart could barely be resolved.

The constant is just a conversion factor to make the numbers come out right for the units you're using (arcseconds, microns, meters).

The general formula is sinθ = 1.22λ/D - the 1.22 comes from the circular geometry of a point source being imaged by a telescope.
 
zoiberg137 said:
When calculating angular resolution, is it correct that having a SMALLER number results in GREATER angular resolution? For example, is 26.25" better resolution than 2625"?

Using the formula .25"(lambda in micrometre/diamter in meters), it would make sense to me that the larger the diameter, the smaller the answer, thus the greater the resolution. I just want to be sure I understand this correctly.

Also, out of curiosity, why are we multiplying by .25"? This is the formula my book gives me...but is this always a constant for this formula?

Thanks!

You may have been 'thrown' by the use of the English language, I think. The word "higher" means 'better' in this context and does not mean a bigger number of minutes of arc.
It is used more in the sense of 'pixels per inch' - as with TV monitors and printers, where 'more' means better resolution.
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top